atom feed5 messages in org.kde.rekonqRe: [rekonq] Licensing issues
FromSent OnAttachments
Vyacheslav BlinovSep 19, 2011 4:20 am 
Andrea DiamantiniSep 19, 2011 6:34 am 
Vyacheslav BlinovSep 19, 2011 6:46 am 
Andrea DiamantiniSep 20, 2011 12:07 am 
Vyacheslav BlinovSep 20, 2011 12:16 am 
Subject:Re: [rekonq] Licensing issues
From:Vyacheslav Blinov (
Date:Sep 19, 2011 6:46:21 am

В сообщении от 19 сентября 2011 17:37:26 автор Andrea Diamantini написал:

On Monday 19 September 2011 15:20:50 Vyacheslav Blinov wrote:

Hi! I had a chat with Jonathan Kolberg on IRC today, he said he found some mess with licenses in rekonq sources.

Nearly all of the tests files and aren`t have license header, websslinfo.* is under LGPL v2 or later (without condition to be approved by KDE e.V.) src/urlbar/webshortcutwidget.* is GPL v2 not approved by KDE e.V.

also were there two copyrights holders droped? since in 0.7 they were present in the copyright headers and now they are


one was in src/sslinfodialog_p.h George Staikos and Malte Starostik in the same file

Fixing that will make packagers life easier.

Hi Vyacheslav, and many thanks for pointing this out.

I'll try to fix things ASAP.

There is error in my message,

Nearly all of the tests files and aren`t have license header,

There is a license GPL v2 or v3 or later but it miss the approved clause.