atom feed28 messages in edu.merit.nanogRe: Level 3 BGP Advertisements
FromSent OnAttachments
Nick OlsenAug 29, 2012 12:28 pm 
Andy DavidsonAug 29, 2012 12:39 pm 
Berry MobleyAug 29, 2012 12:45 pm 
Jon LewisAug 29, 2012 12:48 pm 
RandyAug 29, 2012 12:49 pm 
Nick OlsenAug 29, 2012 12:51 pm 
Hale, William CAug 29, 2012 12:52 pm 
Nick OlsenAug 29, 2012 12:55 pm 
Blake DunlapAug 29, 2012 1:00 pm 
Jon LewisAug 29, 2012 1:03 pm 
Paul VinciguerraAug 29, 2012 1:08 pm 
Blake DunlapAug 29, 2012 1:13 pm 
William HerrinAug 29, 2012 1:35 pm 
Jay AshworthAug 29, 2012 1:55 pm 
STARNES, CURTISAug 29, 2012 1:55 pm 
Grzegorz JanoszkaAug 29, 2012 2:06 pm 
Peter KristolaitisAug 29, 2012 2:31 pm 
William HerrinAug 29, 2012 2:32 pm 
james machadoAug 29, 2012 3:30 pm 
John van OppenAug 29, 2012 4:01 pm 
Matt AddisonAug 29, 2012 4:08 pm 
Harry HoffmanAug 29, 2012 5:06 pm 
Randy BushAug 29, 2012 7:00 pm 
Blake HudsonAug 30, 2012 11:50 am 
james machadoAug 30, 2012 12:48 pm 
John van OppenAug 30, 2012 1:00 pm 
Mikael AbrahamssonAug 30, 2012 1:04 pm 
Marc StorckSep 5, 2012 8:32 am 
Subject:Re: Level 3 BGP Advertisements
From:Marc Storck (msto@voipgate.com)
Date:Sep 5, 2012 8:32:37 am
List:edu.merit.nanog

Just for kicks, I tried using a .0.0/16 and .255.255/16 adress for stuff in IOS (configured it as loopback and tried to establish bgp sessions etc), that didn't work so well. I don't remember exactly what the problem was, but I did indeed run into problems.

LU-CIX uses .255 and .0 for their route servers. See [1]. And it looks like most router fabrics can now handle BGP sessions to those addresses.

Regards,

Marc

[1] http://www.lu-cix.lu/route-servers.html