atom feed63 messages in org.apache.incubator.cloudstack-marketingRe: Packt Book - Publish on our website?
FromSent OnAttachments
5 earlier messages
kel...@backbonetechnology.comMay 20, 2013 12:22 pm 
kel...@backbonetechnology.comMay 20, 2013 12:26 pm 
Musayev, IlyaMay 20, 2013 12:33 pm 
Noah SlaterMay 20, 2013 7:02 pm 
kel...@backbonetechnology.comMay 20, 2013 7:45 pm 
Ahmad EmneinaMay 20, 2013 8:37 pm 
Kimihiko KitaseMay 22, 2013 7:05 am 
Joe BrockmeierMay 22, 2013 12:50 pm 
Noah SlaterMay 22, 2013 12:55 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 22, 2013 1:01 pm 
Joe BrockmeierMay 22, 2013 1:21 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 22, 2013 1:25 pm 
Sebastien GoasguenMay 22, 2013 1:26 pm 
Musayev, IlyaMay 22, 2013 1:27 pm 
Joe BrockmeierMay 22, 2013 1:30 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 22, 2013 1:37 pm 
John KinsellaMay 22, 2013 2:38 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 22, 2013 2:44 pm 
Noah SlaterMay 22, 2013 4:30 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 22, 2013 4:33 pm 
John KinsellaMay 22, 2013 9:05 pm 
kel...@backbonetechnology.comMay 22, 2013 10:02 pm 
Sebastien GoasguenMay 22, 2013 11:06 pm 
Noah SlaterMay 23, 2013 5:25 am 
Musayev, IlyaMay 23, 2013 8:27 am 
Noah SlaterMay 23, 2013 10:38 am 
Sebastien GoasguenMay 23, 2013 10:48 am 
Noah SlaterMay 23, 2013 11:21 am 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 23, 2013 11:25 am 
Noah SlaterMay 23, 2013 11:27 am 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 23, 2013 11:28 am 
Sebastien GoasguenMay 24, 2013 1:20 am 
kel...@backbonetechnology.comMay 24, 2013 2:23 am 
Noah SlaterMay 24, 2013 2:44 am 
Noah SlaterMay 24, 2013 2:47 am 
Joe BrockmeierMay 24, 2013 6:45 am 
kel...@backbonetechnology.comMay 24, 2013 8:29 am 
Joe BrockmeierMay 24, 2013 11:19 am 
Musayev, IlyaMay 24, 2013 1:12 pm 
Chip ChildersMay 24, 2013 1:21 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 24, 2013 1:34 pm 
Sebastien GoasguenMay 24, 2013 1:54 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 24, 2013 2:06 pm 
Noah SlaterMay 24, 2013 3:01 pm 
Sebastien GoasguenMay 24, 2013 3:06 pm 
Noah SlaterMay 24, 2013 3:20 pm 
Musayev, IlyaMay 24, 2013 5:08 pm 
Kelcey Jamison DamageMay 24, 2013 5:52 pm 
Musayev, IlyaMay 24, 2013 11:12 pm 
Giles SirettMay 25, 2013 6:35 am 
8 later messages
Subject:Re: Packt Book - Publish on our website?
From:Musayev, Ilya (imus@webmd.net)
Date:May 23, 2013 8:27:07 am
List:org.apache.incubator.cloudstack-marketing

Perhaps we can revisit the thought of making it commiter written VS comitters
reviewed.

As error safeguard measure it would make sense if have at least 3 commiters
review the publication.

Reason being, while many of us are comitters, some of us maybe more competent in
some areas of ACS and less on the other. Therefore if we have several comitters
review the publication, we minimize the error posibilty. if i was to make an example, i've spent alot of time building private clouds
that would suit traditional enterprises, i may not be an expert on designing web
hosting shops (just yet).

Obviously exclusions apply, if someone have spent many years as a core ACS
architect and developer - he may not need several commiters to review the
publication - though it would not hurt.

The commiters who will be reviewing publication must notify the community via
mailing list. If there are points of uncertainty, the should be brought on ML
as well.

-------- Original message -------- From: Noah Slater <nsla@apache.org> Date: To: mark@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Packt Book - Publish on our website?

On 23 May 2013 05:05, John Kinsella <jl@stratosec.co> wrote:

On May 22, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jz@zonker.net> wrote:

Books authored by committers might be a good metric.

+1

I think this is exclusionary. As Kelcey points out, there's a high probability that some of the best books on CloudStack are not written by committers.

On 23 May 2013 07:06, Sebastien Goasguen <run@gmail.com> wrote:

Let me put it bluntly. IMHO wiki pages are a death sentence, nobody will find that information. If it's not featured on the website then there is no point talking about it.

Blunt, but hyperbolic. ;) If you really feel so strongly about the wiki, you should propose that we shut it down. ;)

The wiki is a community resource, and we should embrace that, and encourage that.

If you're concerned that people visiting the main website will not notice, and will never find, a page that lists third-party resources, then I suggest a patch that provides a link in the nav saying "third-party resources" and link it to the wiki.