atom feed33 messages in org.apache.shale.devAW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
FromSent OnAttachments
Kito D. MannOct 20, 2007 5:18 pm 
Dennis ByrneOct 20, 2007 5:22 pm 
Mario IvankovitsOct 20, 2007 11:51 pm 
Mario IvankovitsOct 21, 2007 12:05 am 
Gary VanMatreOct 21, 2007 10:39 am 
Gary VanMatreOct 21, 2007 10:41 am 
Kito D. MannOct 21, 2007 11:28 am 
Niall PembertonOct 21, 2007 12:38 pm 
Craig McClanahanOct 21, 2007 4:47 pm 
Antonio PetrelliOct 22, 2007 12:02 am 
Bernhard SlominskiOct 22, 2007 5:40 am 
Gary VanMatreOct 22, 2007 7:37 am 
Rahul AkolkarOct 22, 2007 8:11 am 
Greg ReddinOct 22, 2007 8:31 am 
Greg ReddinOct 22, 2007 8:34 am 
Greg ReddinOct 22, 2007 8:41 am 
Greg ReddinOct 22, 2007 8:44 am 
Greg ReddinOct 22, 2007 8:46 am 
Kito D. MannOct 22, 2007 8:48 am 
Pavel SavaraOct 22, 2007 9:14 am 
Gary VanMatreOct 22, 2007 9:23 am 
Bernhard SlominskiOct 22, 2007 9:32 am 
Kito D. MannOct 22, 2007 9:44 am 
Kito D. MannOct 22, 2007 9:48 am 
Kito D. MannOct 22, 2007 9:49 am 
Mario IvankovitsOct 22, 2007 10:54 am 
Kito D. MannOct 25, 2007 10:21 am 
Matthias WessendorfOct 25, 2007 10:42 am 
Martin MarinschekOct 25, 2007 12:32 pm 
Paul SpencerOct 26, 2007 7:26 am 
Kito D. MannOct 26, 2007 9:40 am 
samjuOct 29, 2007 12:53 am 
Kito D. MannOct 29, 2007 10:33 am 
Subject:AW: Merging Shale into MyFaces
From:Bernhard Slominski (bern@zooplus.com)
Date:Oct 22, 2007 5:40:11 am
List:org.apache.shale.dev

Hi all,

I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project. So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting) should not move, but just stay in Shale. Also let's see where templating and component development goes before making a decision about Clay. So Shale is then the JSF 1.X add-on framework, when it comes to JSF 2 all Add-Ons move to MyFaces.

Bernhard

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: crai@gmail.com [mailto:crai@gmail.com]Im Auftrag von Craig McClanahan Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48 An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces

* Remoting Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too.

+1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0.

A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access, particularly for resources provided in a jar file instead of as exploded files in a WAR. Until JSF 2 comes along, that's pretty useful all by itself.

Craig