atom feed43 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsHEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed...
FromSent OnAttachments
Kirill PonomarewNov 13, 2004 2:19 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 5:38 am 
Kirill PonomarewNov 13, 2004 5:58 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 6:06 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 6:24 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 6:27 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 6:46 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 6:51 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 7:08 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 7:16 am 
Mark LinimonNov 13, 2004 7:24 am 
Richard ColemanNov 13, 2004 7:28 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 7:29 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 7:31 am 
Richard ColemanNov 13, 2004 7:38 am 
Mark RussellNov 13, 2004 7:45 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 9:40 am 
Alexandr KovalenkoNov 13, 2004 9:49 am 
Kent StewartNov 13, 2004 10:01 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 10:32 am 
Jeremy MessengerNov 13, 2004 10:35 am 
Matthew SeamanNov 13, 2004 10:37 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 10:43 am 
Frank J. LaszloNov 13, 2004 10:54 am 
Thomas-Martin SeckNov 13, 2004 11:08 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 11:33 am 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 12:01 pm 
Thomas-Martin SeckNov 13, 2004 12:20 pm 
Matthias AndreeNov 13, 2004 4:05 pm 
Michael C. ShultzNov 13, 2004 5:51 pm 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 5:58 pm 
Michael NottebrockNov 13, 2004 6:08 pm 
Michael L. SquiresNov 13, 2004 6:23 pm 
Skip FordNov 13, 2004 7:13 pm 
Matthew SeamanNov 14, 2004 3:15 am 
Benjamin LutzNov 14, 2004 10:47 am 
Mark LinimonNov 14, 2004 3:01 pm 
Kris KennawayNov 14, 2004 3:44 pm 
Benjamin LutzNov 14, 2004 5:45 pm 
Kris KennawayNov 14, 2004 5:53 pm 
Mark LinimonNov 14, 2004 5:57 pm 
Frank J. LaszloNov 26, 2004 6:07 pm 
Kris KennawayNov 26, 2004 6:14 pm 
Subject:HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS.
From:Matthias Andree (ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de)
Date:Nov 13, 2004 4:05:41 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-ports

Michael Nottebrock <mich@gmx.net> writes:

It's unfortunate that the INDEXFILE defaults haven't been changed with the removal (it's also unfortunate that portsdb -U breaks if INDEXFILE is overriden in make.conf, but that's a portupgrade bug). It might take a while until the necessary additional changes have been reviewed - perhaps using sysutils/portsnap to update your portstree will do as a workaround for the time being (you get matching indices for each ports update).

It's unfortunate that major changes are made without public consultation and then only halfway.

"make fetchindex" runs on the order of a minute for my machine (1 Mbit/s link), but I'm definitely not using "make index" on my K6-2/300.

It's about time for a _fast_ index generator, or a cache so that only changed records are replaced. INDEX has been an annoyance ever since but no-one has a decent solution how ports can do without.