17 messages in org.apache.struts.devRe: Repository Reorg (Once More With ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Craig McClanahan | Jul 17, 2004 2:56 pm | |
| Martin Cooper | Jul 17, 2004 5:06 pm | |
| Vic Cekvenich | Jul 17, 2004 6:30 pm | |
| Ted Husted | Jul 18, 2004 5:51 am | |
| Ted Husted | Jul 18, 2004 5:59 am | |
| Ted Husted | Jul 18, 2004 6:01 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Jul 18, 2004 1:15 pm | |
| Ted Husted | Jul 19, 2004 4:24 pm | |
| Craig McClanahan | Jul 19, 2004 4:48 pm | |
| Ted Husted | Jul 19, 2004 5:04 pm | |
| Martin Cooper | Jul 19, 2004 9:06 pm | |
| Martin Cooper | Jul 19, 2004 9:12 pm | |
| Martin Cooper | Jul 19, 2004 9:21 pm | |
| Ted Husted | Jul 20, 2004 3:52 am | |
| Ted Husted | Jul 20, 2004 5:15 am | |
| Niall Pemberton | Jul 20, 2004 6:52 am | |
| Craig McClanahan | Jul 20, 2004 7:48 am |
| Subject: | Re: Repository Reorg (Once More With Feeling) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Ted Husted (hus...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | Jul 20, 2004 5:15:11 am | |
| List: | org.apache.struts.dev | |
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 21:07:14 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote:
�One important question, though: Where are we doing 1.2.x �development / maintenance? Are we leaving that in CVS and splitting �off a new SVN repo for 2.0 development, or are we converting to SVN �lock, stock and barrel?
How about this:
* On the roadmap, we reclassify Struts 1.3+ as Struts 2.0, and what-was 2.0 as
3.0.
* We clear the 1.2.1 problem tickets, issue the 1.2.2 release, and vote whether
it is GA or not.
* We link the Acquiring page to the mirroring system.
* We have infrastructure import the jakarta-struts CVS to an apache-struts SVN,
but we put it all under a "/v1" directory.
* We continue the work we started in the private SVN under a "/v2" directory in
the apache-struts SVN.
So, the top-level of struts-apache would look like
/v1
/v2
/v3
And the branch Craig started for the core subproject would live under
/v2/trunk/core
And the 1.2.2 release would be at
/v1/trunk/
If we needed to make any further releases in the 1.2.x series, we could do those
from there. But let's ship a GA 1.2.2 first.
Thoughts?
-Ted.