23 messages in org.w3.public-esw-thesRe: Modeling change in and between sc...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Joseph Tennis | Aug 28, 2006 12:57 pm | |
| Jakob Voss | Aug 29, 2006 2:26 am | |
| Aida Slavic | Aug 29, 2006 5:13 am | |
| Houghton,Andrew | Aug 29, 2006 6:06 am | |
| Mark van Assem | Aug 29, 2006 7:46 am | |
| Aida Slavic | Aug 29, 2006 8:04 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Aug 29, 2006 8:16 am | |
| Jakob Voss | Aug 29, 2006 10:11 am | |
| Mark van Assem | Aug 29, 2006 2:45 pm | |
| Svensson, Lars | Aug 29, 2006 11:01 pm | |
| Danny Ayers | Aug 30, 2006 2:07 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 1, 2006 9:22 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 1, 2006 9:25 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 1, 2006 9:31 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 1, 2006 9:34 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 1, 2006 9:36 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 1, 2006 9:48 am | |
| Jakob Voss | Sep 4, 2006 12:30 am | |
| Jakob Voss | Sep 4, 2006 12:57 am | |
| Jakob Voss | Sep 4, 2006 1:38 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 4, 2006 6:59 am | |
| Jakob Voss | Sep 5, 2006 12:25 am | |
| Joseph Tennis | Sep 5, 2006 6:16 am |
| Subject: | Re: Modeling change in and between schemes using SKOS - the problem of persistent URIs | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Mark van Assem (ma...@cs.vu.nl) | |
| Date: | Aug 29, 2006 7:46:54 am | |
| List: | org.w3.public-esw-thes | |
Hi,
To solve this issue we proposed using a URI that included scheme, edition, translation, and notation. It would keep the skos:Concept elements from being merged by RDF. To track relationships of
We used a similar solution for WordNet [1]. It is the minimal thing you can do to prevent mistakes, but leaves one with the problem of working with multiple versions of the vocab.
concepts between editions we thought that we could use OWL or use the SKOS mapping vocabulary.
Complicating matter is that what constitutes a good mapping might differ between applications. For one application a small difference between peaches1 and peaches2 might not matter, for another it might.
It seems an open problem; in general there seem to be no established practices for versioning in the RDF/OWL community.
is the predominate religion and not Christianity. So the concept identifier 234.56 in the English edition of Dewey could mean something totally different in the Arabic edition.
Sounds like a case for SKOS mapping. Different URIs for the editions, map the Christianity ones on each other.
Another solution might be to distinguish between the (global) URI and (local) edition identifiers. Christianity would get one global URI and two properties to define the local ID per edition.
Cheers, Mark. -- Mark F.J. van Assem - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam mark...@cs.vu.nl - http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark