atom feed11 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] RES: Limits with ...
FromSent OnAttachments
WatashiMay 13, 2007 3:32 pm 
WatashiMay 14, 2007 9:24 am 
Gordon MessmerMay 14, 2007 10:54 am 
Sam VarshavchikMay 14, 2007 3:18 pm 
Gordon MessmerMay 14, 2007 3:36 pm 
WatashiMay 15, 2007 5:15 am 
Gordon MessmerMay 15, 2007 9:37 am 
WatashiMay 16, 2007 9:47 am 
Gordon MessmerMay 17, 2007 9:40 am.patch
WatashiMay 17, 2007 10:53 am 
Gordon MessmerMay 17, 2007 1:17 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] RES: Limits with LDAP in Authlib?
From:Gordon Messmer (yiny@eburg.com)
Date:May 14, 2007 10:54:58 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Watashi wrote:

As I said before, the ldap server answer the request to authdaemond:

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, Search Request Base DN: DC=test,DC=com

...

Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, Search Entry Time: 0.005837000 seconds Distinguished Name: CN=admin,OU=2300,DC=test,DC=com

Is that a search against the production or test server?

Thanks Sam for the answer. I understood what you said, however I don't know how to answer it, but I have Postfix and pam_ldap working with this LDAP server normally. How could I discover if this record exist?

Do this:

ldapsearch -x -h PROD -s base -b dc=test,dc=com objectclass='*' ldapsearch -x -h DEV -s base -b dc=test,dc=com objectclass='*'

Replace PROD and DEV with the hostnames or IPs of the production and dev servers. This will establish that both LDAP servers have the required entry.

You also indicated that ethereal had shown that both servers were providing answers to the Courier server. It'd be helpful to see that, too.