[1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating - Franklin, Matthew B. - org.apache.incubator.general

6 messages in org.apache.incubator.general[1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release A...

From	Sent On	Attachments
Franklin, Matthew B.	Jan 12, 2012 6:16 am
ant elder	Jan 13, 2012 12:52 am
Franklin, Matthew B.	Jan 13, 2012 5:32 am
Ate Douma	Jan 14, 2012 2:20 pm
ant elder	Jan 17, 2012 1:41 am
Ate Douma	Jan 17, 2012 4:30 am

Subject:	[1 IPMC VOTE NEEDED] [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating
From:	Franklin, Matthew B. (mfra...@mitre.org)
Date:	Jan 12, 2012 6:16:27 am
List:	org.apache.incubator.general

We still need to get one more IPMC vote to close this vote. If someone could
take a look, it would be greatly appreciated.

-Matt

-----Original Message----- From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfra...@mitre.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 8:03 AM To: gene...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

-----Original Message----- From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfra...@mitre.org] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:45 AM To: gene...@incubator.apache.org Cc: rave...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

-----Original Message----- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 8:21 AM To: gene...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

On 9 January 2012 13:09, Franklin, Matthew B. <mfra...@mitre.org>

wrote:

Does my answer below suffice? It would be nice to close this vote out

one

way or another....

The answer describes what happened. However, it does not fix the problem, which is that the end-user sees a file with conflicting information.

Thanks. This is what I was looking for, so that we can have the discussion as to whether or not to cancel the release (we won't do a re-release).

Not a blocker, but you may find it takes less time overall to fix the issue before release rather than dealing with user queries afterwards.

It may also lessen confidence in the release: if there is such an obvious error, what other errors are lurking?

While I agree that it doesn't look great, the CHANGELOG is distributed with the source release and is probably not viewed as much as the release notes sent out with the announcement (which will be the JIRA list I linked). I will take this back to our dev list, but if they don't see it as a blocker, would you be comfortable voting +1?

The community was presented with the issue and via lazy consensus agreed to move forward with the release, even though the CHANGELOG file is incorrect. We still need 1 final IPMC vote to release.

[ Community discussion on proceeding: http://markmail.org/message/tp5nyqh24tdpybw6 ]

-----Original Message----- From: Franklin, Matthew B. [mailto:mfra...@mitre.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 12:19 PM To: gene...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

-----Original Message----- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:06 AM To: gene...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.6-incubating

On 28 December 2011 19:15, Franklin, Matthew B. <mfra...@mitre.org> wrote:

This is the fifth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts

being

versioned as 0.6-incubating.

We are requesting at least one additional IPMC member vote, as we

have

received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev

VOTE: http://s.apache.org/Czr RESULT: http://s.apache.org/yIQ

IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list: Ate Douma: +1 Ross Gardler: +1

Release notes: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/rave/tags/0.6-

incubating/CHANGELOG

Apparently, I didn't commit back the CHANGELOG for 0.6 . Here is the issue list from JIRA