atom feed27 messages in org.apache.lucene.solr-devLucene/Solr 6.0.0 release
FromSent OnAttachments
Michael McCandlessJan 7, 2016 3:07 pm 
Erick EricksonJan 7, 2016 4:56 pm 
Dawid WeissJan 7, 2016 11:40 pm 
Noble PaulJan 8, 2016 5:38 am 
Jan HøydahlJan 8, 2016 6:03 am 
Noble PaulJan 8, 2016 6:34 am 
UpayaviraJan 8, 2016 6:52 am 
Anshum GuptaJan 8, 2016 7:09 am 
Shawn HeiseyJan 8, 2016 7:13 am 
Shawn HeiseyJan 8, 2016 7:51 am 
Erick EricksonJan 8, 2016 8:11 am 
Ishan ChattopadhyayaJan 8, 2016 8:21 am 
Erick EricksonJan 8, 2016 8:27 am 
Jack KrupanskyJan 8, 2016 8:45 am 
Michael McCandlessJan 8, 2016 11:51 am 
Joel BernsteinJan 8, 2016 12:19 pm 
Mark MillerJan 8, 2016 5:24 pm 
Michael McCandlessFeb 4, 2016 9:00 am 
Nicholas KnizeFeb 4, 2016 9:42 am 
Anshum GuptaFeb 4, 2016 10:04 am 
Michael McCandlessFeb 5, 2016 2:17 am 
Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON)Feb 9, 2016 11:03 am 
Michael McCandlessFeb 9, 2016 11:13 am 
Anshum GuptaFeb 9, 2016 11:31 am 
Michael McCandlessFeb 10, 2016 12:15 am 
Christian MoenFeb 10, 2016 12:44 am 
Michael McCandlessFeb 10, 2016 12:58 am 
Subject:Lucene/Solr 6.0.0 release
From:Michael McCandless (luc@mikemccandless.com)
Date:Jan 7, 2016 3:07:20 pm
List:org.apache.lucene.solr-dev

I think we should get the ball rolling for our next major release (6.0.0)?

E.g., dimensional values is a big new feature for 6.x, and I think it's nearly ready except maybe fixing up the API so it's easier for the 1D case.

I think we should maybe remove StorableField before releasing? I.e., go back to what we have in 5.x. This change also caused challenges in the 5.0 release, and we just kicked the can down the road, but I think now we should just kick the can off the road...

http://blog.mikemccandless.com