1 message in org.apache.logging.log4j-userRE: Database Logging Performance Numbers
FromSent OnAttachments
James StaufferJun 24, 2004 7:21 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:RE: Database Logging Performance NumbersActions...
From:James Stauffer (jsta@spscommerce.com)
Date:Jun 24, 2004 7:21:05 am
List:org.apache.logging.log4j-user

I did performance testing comparing writing to the database to writing to the file system but how could my numbers be useful to you size the log size, log frequency, database type, network connection, hardware, etc will all vary compared to you.

-----Original Message----- From: pooja [mailto:poo@induslogic.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 2:32 AM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: FW: Database Logging Performance Numbers

Hi All

I haven't received a response on this issue. Can someone at Log4j answer it for me?

-----Original Message----- From: pooja [mailto:poo@induslogic.com] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 6:50 PM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: Database Logging Performance Numbers

Hello

I am looking for some performance numbers for Database Logging.

I want to be able to analyze/query my log records at a later date in multiple of ways. Hence Logging into database seems to be the perfect choice. But the system is a transactional system and it will be handling more than a million transactions a day. Hence making it necessary, that I first prove that Logging into Database will not hamper performance. Can someone provide some published numbers?

I will be fine with test cases as well; I'll run them against the current file logging system and get comparative figures. Currently, I am writing some crude test cases of my own.

At the same time, if neone knows of some application (which handles so many transactions) already writing logs into database & functioning, this reference will suffice my job.