atom feed1 message in org.oasis-open.lists.oaxal[oaxal] Re: [oaxal-comment] Alternati...
FromSent OnAttachments
Andrzej ZydronJun 18, 2009 12:53 pm 
Subject:[oaxal] Re: [oaxal-comment] Alternative Extraction - differences in procedure
From:Andrzej Zydron (azyd@xml-intl.com)
Date:Jun 18, 2009 12:53:50 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.oaxal

Hi Rodolfo,

Thank you again for your comments and apologies for the length of time it has taken to answer these points. I have been very busy these past few weeks.

Rodolfo M. Raya wrote:

Section 3.4.4 (Alternative Extraction) does not match the process described in section 3.3 (OAXAL Alternative Translation-only Workflow).

Thank you for pointing this out.

In section 3.3 XLIFF creation happens in the first step (text extraction) and the XLIFF file is then segmented in the second step.

In section 3.4.4 text is extracted, then segmented and the XLIFF file is created from segmented text. The order of the tasks is different from the one established previously.

Thank you for pointing this out.

The final comment in section 3.4.4 states that if no database matching is done, the process can be implemented using XSLT. This is incorrect, as segmenting with SRX cannot be done using XSLT.

Thank you for pointing this out. I suggest that this sentence be altered to state that extraction can be implemented in XSLT, but without segmentation.

Best Regards,

AZ

Regards, Rodolfo