19 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRe: tuning for samba| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Chad David | Jul 10, 2002 5:06 pm | |
| Daniel O'Connor | Jul 10, 2002 5:14 pm | |
| Daniel O'Connor | Jul 10, 2002 5:15 pm | |
| Chad David | Jul 10, 2002 5:40 pm | |
| Chad David | Jul 10, 2002 5:44 pm | |
| Daniel O'Connor | Jul 10, 2002 6:03 pm | |
| Richard Sharpe | Jul 10, 2002 6:50 pm | |
| Richard Sharpe | Jul 10, 2002 7:09 pm | |
| Dan Nelson | Jul 10, 2002 7:35 pm | |
| Chad David | Jul 10, 2002 8:30 pm | |
| Darren Pilgrim | Jul 10, 2002 11:30 pm | |
| Darren Pilgrim | Jul 11, 2002 12:15 am | |
| Darren Pilgrim | Jul 11, 2002 12:33 am | |
| Richard Sharpe | Jul 11, 2002 12:52 am | |
| Richard Sharpe | Jul 11, 2002 1:32 am | |
| Chad David | Jul 11, 2002 7:32 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jul 14, 2002 2:45 pm | |
| Richard Sharpe | Jul 14, 2002 4:15 pm | |
| Chad David | Jul 23, 2002 11:39 am |
| Subject: | Re: tuning for samba | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Darren Pilgrim (dm...@pantherdragon.org) | |
| Date: | Jul 11, 2002 12:15:53 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers | |
Richard Sharpe wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Samba uses a seperate process for each connection, and Windows opens one connection per share.
Yes to the first claim, no to the second. Most definitely not. For a single client, windows puts all share access (net use, mounting, whatever you want to call it) over the single TCP connection to the server.
You're right, sorry. I had gotten mixed up on the multiple connection issue because of my own configuration that results in one share per connection.
Nope, ~700 connections!
Even with just one connection per machine, though, you're still going to have a significant amount of swappable memory in idle smbd processes.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message