atom feed17 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpelFault in Compensation
FromSent OnAttachments
Yuzo FujishimaOct 31, 2005 8:37 pm 
Alex YiuOct 31, 2005 8:58 pm 
Satish ThatteOct 31, 2005 10:05 pm 
Dieter Koenig1Nov 1, 2005 8:57 am 
Danny van der RijnNov 1, 2005 10:27 am 
Alexandre AlvesNov 1, 2005 7:06 pm 
Yuzo FujishimaNov 1, 2005 7:13 pm 
Chris KellerNov 2, 2005 4:40 am 
Alex YiuNov 3, 2005 1:39 pm 
Chris KellerNov 3, 2005 1:48 pm 
Dieter Koenig1Nov 4, 2005 1:38 am 
Dieter Koenig1Nov 4, 2005 5:52 am 
Chris KellerNov 4, 2005 6:01 am 
Chris KellerNov 4, 2005 6:01 am 
Dieter Koenig1Nov 4, 2005 6:24 am 
Chris KellerNov 4, 2005 6:34 am 
Alex YiuNov 4, 2005 2:59 pm 
Subject:Fault in Compensation
From:Yuzo Fujishima (fuji@bc.jp.nec.com)
Date:Oct 31, 2005 8:37:50 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.wsbpel

Hi,

I have yet other questions regarding compensation. Could someone help me answer to them?

Suppose we have a process as below:

process P1 faultHandler F0 to catch T1 flow scope S1 faultHandler F1 to catch T2 scope S2 faultHandler F2 to catch T1 compensate CA1 sequence while scope S3 compensationHandler CH1 throw T1 throw T2 scope S4

Further suppose that S3 is successfully completed two times, T2 throws a fault, F1 catches the fault, and then CA1 is executed.

What is expected to happen next is that CH1 is called twice, once for each successful completion.

But what will happen if T1 throws a fault in the first invocation of CH1?

Q1: Will there be the second invocation of CH1?

Q2: Will the fault be propagated to CA1 then to S2? Or S3, S1 (FH uninstalled), then to P1? In other words, which will catch T1, F2 or F0?

Yuzo Fujishima NEC Corporation