| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Luca Masini | Aug 10, 2005 12:23 am | |
| Abhishek | Aug 10, 2005 6:29 am | |
| Luca Masini | Aug 18, 2005 11:47 pm | |
| Luca Masini | Aug 19, 2005 5:33 am | |
| Abhishek | Aug 19, 2005 12:19 pm | |
| Abhishek | Aug 19, 2005 12:28 pm | |
| Luca Masini | Aug 19, 2005 1:11 pm | |
| Luca Masini | Aug 19, 2005 1:13 pm | |
| Abhishek | Aug 19, 2005 1:23 pm | |
| Abhishek | Aug 19, 2005 1:26 pm | |
| Abhishek | Aug 19, 2005 1:28 pm | |
| Costin Leau | Sep 6, 2005 2:05 am |
| Subject: | Approaching a new HibernateStore | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Abhishek (oswo...@opensymphony.com) | |
| Date: | Aug 10, 2005 6:29:20 am | |
| List: | net.java.dev.osworkflow.users | |
all this looks good.
i think navigating from entry may save some database queries if you are using
OSWorkFlow more than once in a request. Also I have seen same query being fired
multiple times within OSWorkflow itself. For example *findCurrentSteps* is
called 3-4 times when you call *doAction*. if we implement this using entry then
this would probably use only one SQL query.
we should have optimistic locking but i am not sure where can we put it. We do
not seem to update anything only inserts and deletes ? am i right ? CuurentStep
is deleted and moved to HistoryStep !
if you can have somehow manage to have the client application session used by
the store without the interface then that should also be great.
I do not want a separate session factory just for this store. I am using the
entry outside OSWorkFlow also. I have it linked to some other objects of the
application. so need the entry object outside this store.
Regards Abhishek
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5360&messageID=12587#12587





