| Subject: | strict DMI | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andreas Sachs (andi...@gmx.de) | |
| Date: | Jan 3, 2012 2:50:18 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.struts.dev | |
Refine Search
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 3, 2012 2:50 pm | |
| John Lindal | Jan 3, 2012 3:42 pm | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 4, 2012 12:48 am | |
| John Lindal | Jan 4, 2012 11:13 am | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 4, 2012 11:59 am | |
| John Lindal | Jan 4, 2012 12:36 pm | |
| John Lindal | Jan 6, 2012 3:08 pm | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 9, 2012 2:45 pm |
| Subject: | strict DMI | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andreas Sachs (andi...@gmx.de) | |
| Date: | Jan 3, 2012 2:50:18 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.struts.dev | |
Hi,
i like the idea of strict-method-invocation="true" and the possibility to define
the allowed methods. I'm just wondering why this is only implemented for DMI and
not for wildcard method invocation.
Are there any reasons for this?
Thanks Andi
-- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de

