atom feed17 messages in org.apache.tomcat.usersRE: Best Practices Question
FromSent OnAttachments
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 1:44 am 
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 4:20 am 
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 4:23 am 
ach...@saysit.comSep 29, 2002 4:26 am 
Barry MooreSep 29, 2002 3:39 pm 
V. CekvenichSep 29, 2002 5:31 pm 
Kent PerrierSep 29, 2002 6:07 pm 
Craig R. McClanahanSep 29, 2002 6:39 pm 
Oskar BartensteinSep 29, 2002 8:30 pm 
Craig R. McClanahanSep 29, 2002 10:17 pm 
Oskar BartensteinSep 30, 2002 1:10 am 
Turner, JohnSep 30, 2002 5:35 am 
Turner, JohnSep 30, 2002 5:38 am 
Step...@bmwfin.comSep 30, 2002 5:38 am 
Craig R. McClanahanSep 30, 2002 9:22 am 
Glenn NielsenSep 30, 2002 1:13 pm 
Glenn NielsenSep 30, 2002 1:45 pm 
Subject:RE: Best Practices Question
From:Craig R. McClanahan (crai@apache.org)
Date:Sep 30, 2002 9:22:18 am
List:org.apache.tomcat.users

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 Step@bmwfin.com wrote:

Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 13:39:07 +0100 From: Step@bmwfin.com Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <tomc@jakarta.apache.org> To: tomc@jakarta.apache.org Subject: RE: Best Practices Question

What about SSL, is it better/more efficient to allow apache to handle the SSL or to drop apache and allow tomcat to do it all?

Tomcat standalone can do SSL, so you've still got a choice -- the difference being that the SSL performance of Apache is likely to be faster. Does that matter? *ONLY* if Tomcat standalone is not fast enough to meet your performance requirements by itself.

You don't always need "fastest possible" -- sometimes "quickest to set up" is the better top priority.

Craig

-----Original Message----- From: Turner, John [mailto:JTur@AAS.com] Sent: 30 September 2002 13:39 To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Best Practices Question

-----Original Message----- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:crai@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 9:40 PM

... snip...

Valid reasons to need it include:

* Tomcat standalone is not fast enough (note that this is different from a rule saying select the "fastest possible" solution -- that turns out not to be a requirement in every scenario).

* You need the extra features that Apache provides (such as integration with existing modules).

* You need to run on port 80 in an environment that requires root for this.

* You already know how to configure it, so there's no extra learning curve.

I would include load-balancing as well (multiple Tomcats, one or more Apaches).

Blindly installing Apache+Tomcat because "that's the thing to do" is a waste of effort in many scenarios.

Agreed.

Craig

John

-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomc@jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomc@jakarta.apache.org>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright material and/or confidential and/or privileged information may be
contained in this e-mail and any attached documents. The material and
information is intended for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are
not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the
intended addressee, you may not copy, disclose, distribute, disseminate or
deliver it to anyone else or use it in any unauthorised manner or take or omit
to take any action in reliance on it. To do so is prohibited and may be
unlawful. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be official policy but the
personal views of the originator. If you receive this e-mail in error, please
advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail
software, or contact post@bmwfin.com. Please also delete this e-mail and
all documents attached immediately. Many thanks for your co-operation.

BMW Financial Services (GB) Limited is registered in England and Wales under
company number 01288537. Registered Offices : Europa House, Bartley Way, Hook, Hants, RG27 9UF
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------