atom feed24 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] I.P. based (virtu...
FromSent OnAttachments
Randy Lewis (Kenneth R. Lewis)Jan 24, 2002 1:03 pm 
Bill WilliamsonJan 24, 2002 1:20 pm 
SysopJan 24, 2002 1:32 pm 
Tim HoskingJan 24, 2002 1:53 pm 
SysopJan 24, 2002 1:59 pm 
Randy Lewis (Kenneth R. Lewis)Jan 24, 2002 2:11 pm 
Johannes ErdfeltJan 24, 2002 2:17 pm 
Aly S.P DharshiJan 24, 2002 2:20 pm 
SysopJan 24, 2002 2:22 pm 
SysopJan 24, 2002 2:24 pm 
Bill WilliamsonJan 24, 2002 2:34 pm 
Randy Lewis (Kenneth R. Lewis)Jan 24, 2002 6:25 pm 
Delyan ToshevJan 25, 2002 8:20 am 
cap...@tomcat.colomsat.net.coJan 25, 2002 8:30 am 
Randy Lewis (Kenneth R. Lewis)Jan 25, 2002 8:57 am 
Tomas FasthJan 25, 2002 10:37 am 
Johannes ErdfeltJan 25, 2002 10:40 am 
Tomas FasthJan 25, 2002 11:03 am 
SysopJan 25, 2002 12:20 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 25, 2002 3:29 pm 
Alessandro VeselyJan 26, 2002 7:34 am 
Tomas FasthJan 26, 2002 8:17 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 26, 2002 5:03 pm 
Drew RainesJan 28, 2002 9:47 am 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] I.P. based (virtual) multiple Domains ...
From:Sysop (sys@foolclan.com)
Date:Jan 24, 2002 2:24:43 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Johannes Erdfelt wrote:

This is a feature:

http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

JE

I know it's a 'feature', but it's an incredibly annoying one and frankly uneeded. Of all the lists I participate in, this is the only one that atleast doesnt modify the 'reply-to' header, yet none of them seem to have any problems... this one just feels way to sloppy and broken IMHO. I've also expressed this opinion to Sourceforge emps (well, VA linux emps, same dif).