

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
89 messages in org.kernel.vger.linux-kernelRe: 2G memory split| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 4:58 am | |
| Ingo Molnar | Jan 10, 2006 5:29 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 5:37 am | |
| Byron Stanoszek | Jan 10, 2006 5:43 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 5:47 am | |
| Mikael Pettersson | Jan 10, 2006 5:47 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 5:53 am | |
| Gerd Hoffmann | Jan 10, 2006 6:09 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 6:11 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 6:21 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 6:22 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 6:25 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 6:39 am | |
| Ingo Molnar | Jan 10, 2006 6:43 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 7:03 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 7:11 am | .patch |
| Mikael Pettersson | Jan 10, 2006 7:23 am | |
| Linus Torvalds | Jan 10, 2006 8:14 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 8:30 am | .patch, .patch |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 8:39 am | |
| Linus Torvalds | Jan 10, 2006 8:52 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 8:56 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 9:00 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 9:06 am | |
| Sergey Vlasov | Jan 10, 2006 9:07 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 9:13 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 9:17 am | |
| Linus Torvalds | Jan 10, 2006 9:28 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 9:32 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 9:36 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 9:36 am | |
| Bernd Eckenfels | Jan 10, 2006 9:48 am | |
| Martin Bligh | Jan 10, 2006 10:14 am | |
| Coywolf Qi Hunt | Jan 10, 2006 10:27 am | |
| Coywolf Qi Hunt | Jan 10, 2006 10:32 am | |
| Linus Torvalds | Jan 10, 2006 10:34 am | |
| Martin Bligh | Jan 10, 2006 10:39 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 10:45 am | |
| Martin Bligh | Jan 10, 2006 10:46 am | |
| Lennart Sorensen | Jan 10, 2006 10:50 am | |
| Dave Hansen | Jan 10, 2006 10:54 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 10:57 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 10:57 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 11:01 am | |
| Dave Hansen | Jan 10, 2006 11:04 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 11:12 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 10, 2006 11:15 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 11:26 am | |
| Jeff V. Merkey | Jan 10, 2006 11:30 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 11:41 am | |
| Bernd Eckenfels | Jan 10, 2006 12:17 pm | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 12:27 pm | |
| Jan Engelhardt | Jan 10, 2006 12:42 pm | |
| Alan Cox | Jan 10, 2006 12:54 pm | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 10, 2006 1:02 pm | |
| Con Kolivas | Jan 10, 2006 4:25 pm | |
| J.A. Magallon | Jan 10, 2006 5:12 pm | |
| Bernd Eckenfels | Jan 11, 2006 12:39 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 11, 2006 2:05 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Jan 11, 2006 2:15 am | |
| Greg Norris | Jan 11, 2006 8:00 am | |
| Mark Lord | Jan 11, 2006 9:12 am | |
| Greg Norris | Jan 11, 2006 9:44 am | |
| Herbert Poetzl | Feb 1, 2006 2:22 pm | |
| Ulrich Mueller | Feb 2, 2006 3:03 am | |
| Jan Engelhardt | Feb 2, 2006 12:55 pm | |
| Mark Lord | Feb 3, 2006 2:38 pm | |
| Ulrich Mueller | Feb 4, 2006 2:22 am | |
| Jens Axboe | Feb 4, 2006 2:35 am | |
| Jan Engelhardt | Feb 4, 2006 3:04 am | |
| Jan Engelhardt | Feb 4, 2006 3:05 am | |
| Mark Lord | Feb 4, 2006 5:57 am | |
| J.A. Magallon | Feb 5, 2006 7:32 am | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Feb 5, 2006 7:38 am | |
| Barry K. Nathan | Feb 5, 2006 10:41 am | |
| Bodo Eggert | Feb 5, 2006 12:20 pm | |
| Jan Engelhardt | Feb 5, 2006 1:13 pm | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Feb 5, 2006 1:18 pm | |
| Jeff Dike | Feb 5, 2006 2:12 pm | |
| Jan Engelhardt | Feb 6, 2006 6:56 am | |
| Herbert Poetzl | Feb 6, 2006 4:41 pm | |
| Mark Rustad | Feb 6, 2006 6:50 pm | |
| Bernd Petrovitsch | Feb 7, 2006 1:37 am | |
| Adrian Bunk | Feb 7, 2006 4:19 am | |
| Ulrich Mueller | Feb 7, 2006 6:05 am | |
| Adrian Bunk | Feb 7, 2006 6:42 am | |
| Jan Engelhardt | Feb 9, 2006 8:06 am | |
| Kirill Korotaev | Apr 10, 2006 7:10 am | |
| Mark Lord | Apr 10, 2006 7:39 am |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: 2G memory split | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jens Axboe (axb...@suse.de) | |
| Date: | Jan 10, 2006 5:53:42 am | |
| List: | org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel | |
On Tue, Jan 10 2006, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
Jens Axboe writes:
Hi,
It does annoy me that any 1G i386 machine will end up with 1/8th of the memory as highmem. A patch like this one has been used in various places since the early 2.4 days at least, is there a reason why it isn't merged yet? Note I just hacked this one up, but similar patches abound I'm sure. Bugs are mine.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axb...@suse.de>
diff --git a/arch/i386/Kconfig b/arch/i386/Kconfig index d849c68..0b2457b 100644 --- a/arch/i386/Kconfig +++ b/arch/i386/Kconfig @@ -444,6 +464,24 @@ config HIGHMEM64G
endchoice
+choice + depends on NOHIGHMEM + prompt "Memory split" + default DEFAULT_3G + help + Select the wanted split between kernel and user memory. On a 1G + machine, the 3G/1G default split will result in 128MiB of high + memory. Selecting a 2G/2G split will make all of memory available + as low memory. Note that this will make your kernel incompatible + with binary only kernel modules.
2G/2G is not the only viable alternative. On my 1GB x86 box I'm
Yes I know, as I wrote to Ingo I wanted to keep it really simple. It can easily be extended, of course.
using "lowmem1g" patches for both 2.4 and 2.6, which results in 2.75G for user-space. I'm sure others have other preferences. Any standard option for this should either have several hard-coded alternatives, or should support arbitrary values (within reason).
That's just asking for trouble, imho. We should provide some defaults (that work well on 1G and 2G machines, for instance) and stick to that.
(See http://www.csd.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/patches/*/patch-i386-lowmem1g-* if you're interested.)
It's similar to what I've been doing so far (just changing page.h to 0xb0000000). 0x80000000 might be a bad default as suggested by Byron, as it just misses the full 2G.
0xb0000000 is a much better default, but I didn't think that would fly as a patch.
-- Jens Axboe
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/








.patch