atom feed10 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.humanmarkup-commentRE: [humanmarkup-comment] Base Schema...
FromSent OnAttachments
Rex BrooksJul 29, 2002 8:03 am 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Jul 29, 2002 12:51 pm 
Rex BrooksJul 29, 2002 1:37 pm 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Jul 30, 2002 7:56 am 
Rex BrooksJul 30, 2002 9:00 am 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Jul 30, 2002 9:03 am 
Rex BrooksJul 30, 2002 9:23 am 
Rex BrooksAug 1, 2002 9:02 am 
Rex BrooksAug 2, 2002 6:33 am 
Rex BrooksAug 2, 2002 9:05 am 
Subject:RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Base Schema-community
From:Bullard, Claude L (Len) (clbu@ingr.com)
Date:Jul 30, 2002 9:03:08 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.humanmarkup-comment

The sign system per se is the sign element type. I haven't spent time defining its subelement types. I am like you, spending time on work items (in this case, a Foxpro application for the day gig).

len

-----Original Message----- From: Rex Brooks [mailto:re@starbourne.com]

Yep. I agree. How are we doing on sign systems? I saw a few posts on xml-dev that included semiotes, but I have been too busy cranking out the facial animation system to pay enough attention. Do we have an idea what begins to constitute a sign system per se?