51 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] unit tests!| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 29, 2005 12:14 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Dec 29, 2005 1:48 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 29, 2005 2:15 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 29, 2005 2:32 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 29, 2005 2:47 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Dec 29, 2005 3:31 pm | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Dec 29, 2005 5:46 pm | |
| c | Dec 29, 2005 6:42 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 29, 2005 6:55 pm | |
| Marc Lavallée | Dec 29, 2005 8:48 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Dec 29, 2005 10:42 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 30, 2005 6:39 am | |
| Marc Lavallée | Dec 30, 2005 9:49 am | |
| Yves Degoyon | Dec 30, 2005 12:45 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Dec 30, 2005 12:48 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Dec 30, 2005 2:12 pm | |
| Yves Degoyon | Dec 30, 2005 2:18 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 30, 2005 3:20 pm | |
| Christian Klippel | Dec 30, 2005 4:28 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Dec 30, 2005 7:26 pm | |
| Kyle Klipowicz | Dec 30, 2005 7:36 pm | |
| David Plans Casal | Dec 31, 2005 4:08 am | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Jan 1, 2006 9:48 am | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Jan 1, 2006 9:52 am | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Jan 1, 2006 10:46 am | |
| Christian Klippel | Jan 1, 2006 10:57 am | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Jan 1, 2006 11:09 am | |
| Christian Klippel | Jan 1, 2006 11:41 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jan 1, 2006 12:22 pm | |
| Tim Blechmann | Jan 1, 2006 12:32 pm | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Jan 1, 2006 1:34 pm | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Jan 1, 2006 1:42 pm | |
| Christian Klippel | Jan 1, 2006 1:50 pm | |
| David Plans Casal | Jan 2, 2006 3:50 am | |
| ydeg...@free.fr | Jan 2, 2006 1:07 pm | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jan 2, 2006 2:30 pm | |
| Marc Lavallée | Jan 2, 2006 5:32 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jan 2, 2006 11:52 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jan 3, 2006 12:13 am | |
| Mathieu Bouchard | Jan 3, 2006 7:44 am | |
| c | Jan 3, 2006 9:07 am | |
| Marc Lavallée | Jan 3, 2006 9:41 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jan 3, 2006 5:35 pm | |
| Marc Lavallée | Jan 4, 2006 7:10 am | |
| B. Bogart | Jan 4, 2006 9:18 am | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jan 4, 2006 9:24 am | |
| Marc Lavallée | Jan 4, 2006 11:00 am | |
| Chris McCormick | Jan 5, 2006 3:26 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jan 5, 2006 7:29 pm | |
| Hans-Christoph Steiner | Jan 5, 2006 7:35 pm | |
| Marc Lavallée | Jan 6, 2006 6:35 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD-dev] unit tests! | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Tim Blechmann (TimB...@gmx.net) | |
| Date: | Dec 29, 2005 3:31:01 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-dev | |
* failure: a test object reports a problem through outlet 0.
how do you want it to be implemented? one object per patch, per canvas (like switch~) or globally?
I don't understand your question, but then maybe you misread something or that I miswrote something.
Test objects only test what they can.
ah, sorry, i misunderstood your mail ...
i'd also suggest the addition of an assert object, that's similar to my external on the cvs...
ok, I think that given what yours do, it should be called [error]. Also it should take an optional argument which would either be a float (e.g. the $0 of the enclosing abstraction) or a pointer. It would have one inlet, no outlet, and support the following messages:
i intended assert to be an object without overhead... but i also like your generalisation. the only problem i see is, that i'd like to switch off the runtime overhead in performance mode and check the asserts only in debug mode, which would be either a canvas property or a global property ... (unfortunately this distinction doesn't really exist in pd)
tim
-- mailto:TimB...@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
You can play a shoestring if you're sincere John Coltrane