atom feed21 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-securityRe: openssl advisory
FromSent OnAttachments
Kosaku NagasakaFeb 24, 2003 4:01 pm 
KIMURA YasuhiroFeb 24, 2003 4:59 pm 
Jacques A. VidrineFeb 24, 2003 6:04 pm 
Jacques A. VidrineFeb 24, 2003 6:20 pm 
Jacques A. VidrineFeb 24, 2003 7:44 pm 
KIMURA YasuhiroFeb 25, 2003 6:30 am 
Krzysztof PtaszekFeb 25, 2003 7:53 am 
Jacques A. VidrineFeb 25, 2003 12:12 pm 
KIMURA YasuhiroFeb 26, 2003 4:08 pm 
Jacques A. VidrineFeb 26, 2003 4:50 pm 
Gareth HopkinsFeb 27, 2003 12:56 am 
KIMURA YasuhiroFeb 27, 2003 8:05 am.Other
Jacques A. VidrineFeb 27, 2003 8:09 am 
KIMURA YasuhiroFeb 27, 2003 8:48 am 
Chris SamaritoniFeb 27, 2003 9:36 am 
Crist J. ClarkFeb 27, 2003 3:58 pm 
Jacques A. VidrineFeb 28, 2003 6:01 am 
Duncan Patton a CampbellFeb 28, 2003 5:09 pm 
Jacques A. VidrineMar 1, 2003 6:18 am 
KIMURA YasuhiroMar 3, 2003 7:10 am 
Jacques A. VidrineMar 3, 2003 7:38 am 
Subject:Re: openssl advisory
From:Jacques A. Vidrine (nec@FreeBSD.org)
Date:Feb 24, 2003 6:20:48 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-security

On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 10:00:21AM +0900, KIMURA Yasuhiro wrote:

I applied openssl47.patch to my 4.7R source tree, but some parts of the patch were rejected as following.

sugar# patch -s < /tmp/security-fixes/openssl47.patch 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to UPDATING.rej 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to crypto/openssl/apps/openssl.cnf.rej 1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to crypto/openssl/apps/speed.c.rej Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [y] ^Csugar#

Does anybody suceed?

I'm afraid there's something amiss with the patch set I generated with CVS :-( I will have to redo them. Meanwhile, please use CVSup. I'm sorry for the inconvenience. Cheers,

-- Jacques A. Vidrine <nec@celabo.org> http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvid@verio.net . nec@FreeBSD.org . nec@kth.se

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message