10 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] PIX OS 7.0 and PIX520, suppor...
FromSent OnAttachments
Brian FeenyJan 25, 2005 12:29 pm 
Chris CappuccioJan 26, 2005 4:32 am 
Gert DoeringJan 26, 2005 5:22 am 
Joe MaimonJan 26, 2005 5:54 am 
Rodney DunnJan 26, 2005 9:06 am 
Brian FeenyJan 26, 2005 10:29 am 
Sean GrangerJan 26, 2005 10:35 am 
Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBNJan 26, 2005 10:55 am 
Chris CappuccioJan 26, 2005 1:07 pm 
Brian FeenyJan 26, 2005 2:24 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] PIX OS 7.0 and PIX520, supported?Actions...
From:Brian Feeny (sig@shreve.net)
Date:Jan 26, 2005 2:24:47 pm
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

I think I picked up the sarcasm..........but there are people on cisco-nsp that will defend the "firewalls do not route packets" argument until death, so sometimes its hard to tell.

Brian

On Jan 26, 2005, at 12:08 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:

Brian Feeny [signal at shreve.net] wrote:

Seriously, you don't have to break it down :) "Hairpinning" when talking about VPN's has a different meaning. Although even "hairpinning" of VPN's does require routing.

I guess my sarcasm was lost. Thanks to everyone for informing me that firewalls also route packets :)

-- The past cannot be changed. The future cannot be guaranteed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------ Brian Feeny, CCIE #8036, CISSP e: signal at shreve.net Network Engineer p: 318.213.4709 ShreveNet Inc. f: 318.221.6612