Ahoy,

I am looking at the debian packaging of cantor right now and noticed that it doesn't actually package the headers, nor the .so symlink of libcantorlibs.

It makes me wonder whether the library really should be public at all?

Usually when debian gets away with not packaging the headers/symlink it's a good sign of the library not being used by anything so it could be made private. Privateness having the advantage that one doesn't have to care about ABI compatibility (respectively bumping the so-version accordingly).

Thoughts?

HS