37 messages in org.gnome.foundation-listRe: Code of conduct (bis)| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dave Neary | Dec 1, 2006 6:02 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 7:05 am | |
| Adrian Custer | Dec 1, 2006 7:36 am | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 1, 2006 9:31 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 9:44 am | |
| Danilo Šegan | Dec 1, 2006 10:43 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 11:03 am | |
| Anne Østergaard | Dec 1, 2006 11:11 am | |
| Glynn Foster | Dec 1, 2006 12:24 pm | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 1, 2006 12:34 pm | |
| Mariano Suárez-Alvarez | Dec 1, 2006 7:02 pm | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 1, 2006 9:06 pm | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 2, 2006 1:24 am | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 2, 2006 2:02 am | |
| Johannes Schmid | Dec 2, 2006 5:21 am | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 2, 2006 5:55 am | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 2, 2006 6:29 am | |
| Danilo Šegan | Dec 3, 2006 1:35 pm | |
| Adam Schreiber | Dec 3, 2006 1:47 pm | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 8:50 am | |
| Olav Vitters | Dec 4, 2006 9:53 am | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 10:27 am | |
| Olav Vitters | Dec 4, 2006 10:49 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 4, 2006 11:44 am | |
| Philip Van Hoof | Dec 4, 2006 12:13 pm | |
| Andrew Sobala | Dec 4, 2006 12:49 pm | |
| Elijah Newren | Dec 4, 2006 2:53 pm | |
| Jeff Waugh | Dec 4, 2006 3:02 pm | |
| Telsa Gwynne | Dec 8, 2006 1:26 pm | |
| Dave Neary | Dec 8, 2006 2:42 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 8, 2006 3:39 pm | |
| Alan Horkan | Dec 10, 2006 7:02 pm | |
| Jeff Waugh | Dec 10, 2006 7:42 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 12, 2006 3:58 pm | |
| Quim Gil | Dec 12, 2006 4:07 pm | |
| Murray Cumming | Dec 14, 2006 2:59 am | |
| Murray Cumming | Jan 16, 2007 6:40 am |
| Subject: | Re: Code of conduct (bis) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Sobala (ae...@gnome.org) | |
| Date: | Dec 4, 2006 12:49:33 pm | |
| List: | org.gnome.foundation-list | |
Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 18:53 +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
I signed the code of conduct under the strict condition that there is no official enforcement of these principles, and that it should not be interpreted like a legal document.
s/condition/assumption/ ?
No. It's a condition that I put next to my signature. Not an assumption.
If the condition is false, my signature is invalid. If that isn't possible, then I'll unsign now (just let me know).
Well, it is not endorsed at the moment.
It has 82 signatures. Last year 169 members could be bothered to vote for the board. It sounds like we've pretty much got community adoption now, or will in a couple of days ;-)
Additionally, the mailing list consensus is that no top-down adoption is necessary, and the board consensus is that there is not going to be any top-down forced adoption anyway.
So let's link to it from www.gnome.org, and we're finished with this. Am I right?
-- Andrew