atom feed20 messages in at.iem.pd-listRe: [PD] Dynamic generation of $0-inc...
FromSent OnAttachments
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 6:54 pm 
Alexandre QuessyFeb 7, 2007 8:34 pm 
Chris McCormickFeb 7, 2007 9:11 pm.pd
Chris McCormickFeb 7, 2007 11:00 pm 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 11:15 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 7, 2007 11:23 pm 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 7, 2007 11:33 pm 
PatcoFeb 8, 2007 2:41 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 2:44 am 
PatcoFeb 8, 2007 3:32 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 8, 2007 4:35 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 4:45 am 
SteffenFeb 8, 2007 5:20 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 5:45 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 8, 2007 5:57 am 
SteffenFeb 8, 2007 6:05 am 
Luke Iannini (pd)Feb 8, 2007 6:11 am 
hard offFeb 8, 2007 9:12 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 8, 2007 1:31 pm 
hard offFeb 8, 2007 3:18 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD] Dynamic generation of $0-including objects?
From:Chris McCormick (chr@mccormick.cx)
Date:Feb 7, 2007 11:00:43 pm
List:at.iem.pd-list

On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:16:02AM -0700, Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:

Hm... I'm not sure if your patch was supposed to "work" or demonstrate my issue, Chris... thanks for making it regardless : ).

It was supposed to solve your problem.

Thanks to both of yas! Should probably add this to puredata.org or something for posterity. Or a bug report since it's obviously a kludge.

If you consider it a kludge, then most of Pd is a kludge. ;)

I don't think it's that bad, or at least no worse than any of the other dynamic patching stuff. Maybe slightly better would be a character escaping mechanism like [\$0(

Best,

Chris.

------------------- chr@mccormick.cx http://mccormick.cx