| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 1:42 am | |
| Ian Holsman | Dec 1, 2008 3:05 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 3:14 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Dec 1, 2008 2:21 pm | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 8:20 pm | |
| Chris Hostetter | Dec 1, 2008 9:24 pm | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 1, 2008 10:02 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 6:29 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Dec 2, 2008 7:11 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 7:45 am | |
| Jason Rutherglen | Dec 2, 2008 8:05 am | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Dec 2, 2008 8:41 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 8:44 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 8:46 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 9:02 am | |
| Dawid Weiss | Dec 2, 2008 9:03 am | |
| Shalin Shekhar Mangar | Dec 2, 2008 9:08 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 2, 2008 9:25 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 10:12 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | Dec 2, 2008 9:00 pm | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 2, 2008 10:28 pm | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Dec 3, 2008 2:59 am | |
| Grant Ingersoll | Dec 3, 2008 4:22 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | Dec 3, 2008 5:43 am | |
| Mark Miller | Dec 3, 2008 5:47 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 3, 2008 7:19 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 12:43 am | |
| Sami Siren | Dec 4, 2008 7:20 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 7:29 am | |
| Ryan McKinley | Dec 4, 2008 8:22 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 8:32 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 4, 2008 8:37 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 8:47 am | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 4, 2008 11:26 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 4, 2008 8:49 pm | |
| Yonik Seeley | Dec 5, 2008 6:16 am | |
| Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् | Dec 5, 2008 8:45 am |
| Subject: | Re: Can we use Berkley DB java in Solr | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andrzej Bialecki (ab...@getopt.org) | |
| Date: | Dec 2, 2008 8:41:43 am | |
| List: | org.apache.lucene.solr-dev | |
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
It's mostly dead and synchronizes on reads and writes.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Yonik Seeley <yon...@apache.org> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org> wrote:
Please consider using JDBM, now in the Apache incubator,
It doesn't look like it's in the incubator yet... there was interest, but a proposal was never put on the wiki.
Oh, indeed. I remembered reading about it and trying to get it from the incubator, but in the end I got it from SF. Sorry for the confusion.
but with a long history at SF.net and wide usage. Its API is essentially the same as BDB.
You wouldn't be able to tell by the SourceForge page - it has the look of a dead project.
The project is semi-dead (a zombie? ;) ), there has been some activity recently if you know where to look - which is not the SF CVS repo, but confusingly the SVN repo:
https://jdbm.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/jdbm
It would be a shame if this project died, that's about the only option out there of a Java dbm-like data store under a liberal license.
-- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com





