19 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-cimRe: [Xen-cim] Requirements and priori...
FromSent OnAttachments
Jim Fehlig14 Dec 2006 13:28 
Subrahmanian, Raj15 Dec 2006 14:00 
Gareth S Bestor15 Dec 2006 14:57.gif, .gif, .gif
Subrahmanian, Raj18 Dec 2006 14:12.patch
Subrahmanian, Raj19 Dec 2006 06:48 
Jim Fehlig19 Dec 2006 08:27 
Subrahmanian, Raj19 Dec 2006 09:02.patch
Subrahmanian, Raj19 Dec 2006 15:37.patch
Ewan Mellor19 Dec 2006 15:52 
Ewan Mellor19 Dec 2006 16:17 
Jim Fehlig19 Dec 2006 16:32 
Ewan Mellor19 Dec 2006 16:38 
Simon Crosby19 Dec 2006 18:54 
Subrahmanian, Raj20 Dec 2006 06:21.gz
Gareth S Bestor21 Dec 2006 11:34.gif, .gif, .gif
Gareth S Bestor21 Dec 2006 11:46.gif, .gif, .gif
Simon Crosby21 Dec 2006 21:18.gif, .gif, .gif, 6 more
Oliver Benke23 Dec 2006 05:14.pdf, .gif, .gif, 8 more
Gareth S Bestor24 Dec 2006 13:30 
Subject:Re: [Xen-cim] Requirements and priorities for SLES10 SP1
From:Ewan Mellor (ew@xensource.com)
Date:12/19/2006 03:52:43 PM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-cim

On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 02:58:21PM -0800, Gareth S. Bestor wrote:

What kind of metrics are we lookng for here?

Oliver Benke has already implemented a few Xen metrics which he's checked into the SBLIM project Data Gatherer. These are conformant to the DMTF Metrics model, at least as it stands today. In terms of metrics I think the hard prolbem is getting good raw data outa xend and/or the DomU's. Exposing them as CIM object thru the SBLIM Data gatherer will be the easy part.

Do you have any notes on this that I could see? I'd like to get the stats gathering into Xend and the Xen-API soon, so I would certainly appreciate it if you've got a requirements list for me.

...I am not sure if we can do it all from CIM (since we are only going

to go through the XenAPI).

Doing everything thru XenAPI is certianly cleaner (and makes life easier for us) but its not an absolutely requirement... We can certainly ask to broaden the scope of XenAPIs coverage, but it may still be the case that the CIM providers will have to exploit other APIs/OS mgmt interfaces to do things.

Yes, you certainly _can_ ask for Xen-API to be extended where necessary. What do you need? Don't forget, Xen-API is going to be the _only_ off-box API preserved over the long term. It's in everybody's interests if the CIM providers can do everything that they need through that API. Please, feel free to ask if there are bits that are missing.

Ewan.