11 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ebxml-jcRE: [ebxml-jc] two issues| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Karl F. Best | Dec 8, 2001 12:01 pm | |
| Dale Moberg | Dec 9, 2001 3:52 pm | |
| Philippe De Smedt | Dec 10, 2001 9:34 am | |
| Karl F. Best | Dec 10, 2001 11:13 am | |
| Dale Moberg | Dec 10, 2001 11:53 am | |
| Nikola Stojanovic | Dec 10, 2001 12:07 pm | |
| Hayes, Brian | Dec 10, 2001 1:21 pm | |
| Philippe De Smedt | Dec 10, 2001 1:48 pm | |
| Karl F. Best | Dec 11, 2001 7:46 am | |
| Colleen Evans | Dec 11, 2001 9:40 am | |
| Dale Moberg | Dec 12, 2001 5:36 am |
| Subject: | RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Dale Moberg (dmob...@cyclonecommerce.com) | |
| Date: | Dec 12, 2001 5:36:02 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.ebxml-jc | |
I would like to add 2 issues to the agenda:
1. How should references to not yet approved standards be handled? For example, the BPSS version 1.1 will probably lag CPPA. CPPA will probably lag Messaging.
2. We have a draft specification that straddles groups (normative spec on how to populate Message fields with values from a CPA.) Is there a joint TC approval process? Can a spec be jointly issued? If a spec must be issued by one TC, how can another TC be given a voice in its discussion?
(Conformance specs may have similar issues.)
Thanks Dale Moberg
-----Original Message----- From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl...@oasis-open.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 8:43 AM To: Dale Moberg; ebxm...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
Thurs 20th at 3:00 EST is fine with me.
</karl> ================================================================= Karl F. Best OASIS - Director, Technical Operations 978.667.5115 x206 karl...@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
-----Original Message----- From: Dale Moberg [mailto:dmob...@cyclonecommerce.com] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:52 PM To: Karl F. Best; ebxm...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
OK, since your issues are the agenda, we should wait. The following week Friday is out for me. Is Thursday at 3 Eastern possible? I will assume yes unless you post otherwise.
Dale Moberg
-----Original Message----- From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl...@oasis-open.org] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:10 PM To: Dale Moberg; ebxm...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
I won't be able to make it Friday at 11; I'm chairing a session at that time. I'm pretty booked for the entire week; for me it would be best to put this off until next week.
</karl> ================================================================= Karl F. Best OASIS - Director, Technical Operations 978.667.5115 x206 karl...@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
-----Original Message----- From: Dale Moberg [mailto:dmob...@cyclonecommerce.com] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:50 PM To: Karl F. Best; ebxm...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [ebxml-jc] two issues
It looks like there is an agenda for a meeting, so the next step is to find a good time to have one. I propose this Friday, Dec. 14, 8 Pacific, 11 Eastern and appropriately adjusted elsewhere. The agenda can be discussion of the 2 issues raised below and anything else that people send in.
Dale Moberg
-----Original Message----- From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl...@oasis-open.org] Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 12:59 PM To: ebxm...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ebxml-jc] two issues
JC:
A couple of issues I need to raise:
1. As you are probably aware, the Vienna ebXML MoU between OASIS and UN/CEFACT specified that each side would have three voting reps and two non-voting technical rep to a joint management group. OASIS' three reps are Patrick Gannon (OASIS CEO), Simon Nicholson, and Norbert Mikula, all from the OASIS Board of Directors. I am one of the non-voting technical reps, and we are in need of a second. The OASIS Board would like the JC to nominate a person to fill that role; the Board would then make the final decision.
Responsibilities of the rep are to attend meetings of the joint management team to represent OASIS technical activities. Meetings are bi-weekly phone calls, and possible occasional f2f meetings that would likely be scheduled to coincide with other meetings (I don't think we'd ever schedule a stand-alone meeting; we want to keep this light-weight.)
2. You're probably aware that the Vienna agreement also stated that there would be a joint architecture team to design the next phase of the ebXML specs. ebTWG has gone ahead and formed an architecture team on their side, and are waiting for OASIS to do the same. The two teams would then comprise the joint team, or perhaps send reps to be members of the joint team.
The OASIS Board would like to hear recommendations from the JC on how to form the architecture team and how it should operate. For example, does the JC itself want to be the OASIS architecture team? Or should it be a separate TC or JC? Should it be restricted to ebXML only, or would it define an architecture for all OASIS e-business technical work?
Dale: would you please put these two items on the agenda for the next JC meeting? (BTW, when is it?)
</karl> ================================================================= Karl F. Best OASIS - Director, Technical Operations 978.667.5115 x206 karl...@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>