atom feed29 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-amd64Re: [ATA] and re(4) stability issues
FromSent OnAttachments
Victor Balada DiazDec 9, 2008 10:52 am.verbose
Pyun YongHyeonDec 9, 2008 10:12 pm 
Andrey V. ElsukovDec 10, 2008 12:57 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 10, 2008 12:59 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 10, 2008 1:10 am 
Søren SchmidtDec 10, 2008 1:55 am 
Pyun YongHyeonDec 10, 2008 2:27 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 10, 2008 3:32 am 
Pyun YongHyeonDec 10, 2008 4:06 am 
Oliver PeterDec 10, 2008 4:08 am 
Arnaud HoudeletteDec 10, 2008 4:17 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 10, 2008 6:01 am 
Gary JennejohnDec 10, 2008 6:01 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 10, 2008 6:08 am 
Oliver PeterDec 10, 2008 6:18 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 10, 2008 6:20 am 
Peter JeremyDec 10, 2008 10:05 am 
Pyun YongHyeonDec 10, 2008 6:49 pm 
Victor Balada DiazDec 10, 2008 11:56 pm 
Victor Balada DiazDec 11, 2008 12:00 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 11, 2008 12:10 am 
Pyun YongHyeonDec 11, 2008 1:00 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 11, 2008 1:49 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 12, 2008 4:12 am 
Pyun YongHyeonDec 12, 2008 5:42 pm 
Victor Balada DiazDec 15, 2008 1:01 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 15, 2008 1:06 am 
Victor Balada DiazDec 15, 2008 11:18 pm 
Pyun YongHyeonDec 15, 2008 11:48 pm 
Subject:Re: [ATA] and re(4) stability issues
From:Pyun YongHyeon (pyu@gmail.com)
Date:Dec 15, 2008 11:48:28 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-amd64

On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:02:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote:

Stopped stress testing this morning. After all the weekend testing seems the re(4) problems were fixed. No single interface up/down error. netstat -i reports no errors and everything is fine. Thanks a lot!

I'm going to deploy the patches on our production machines.

I've been able to trigger interrupt storms with ATA code, though.

After deploying it in various machines this night i've found in the logs messages like this one:

re0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering

I know you told me this is harmless, so this is just so you

Yes, it's not real watchdog timeout as long as re(4) still works correctly.

know it's happening.

Ok. I'll update re(4) when I find spare time.