atom feed45 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-smpRe: Dual Celeron + FreeBSD?
FromSent OnAttachments
Adam StrohlNov 4, 1999 1:26 pm 
Scott MyronNov 4, 1999 2:08 pm 
Adam SerediukNov 4, 1999 3:33 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesNov 4, 1999 4:01 pm 
Adam SerediukNov 4, 1999 4:05 pm 
Oliver FrommeNov 4, 1999 4:06 pm 
David ScheidtNov 4, 1999 5:46 pm 
Darryl OkahataNov 4, 1999 6:03 pm 
Daniel O'ConnorNov 4, 1999 6:09 pm 
Tom EmbtNov 4, 1999 6:29 pm 
David ScheidtNov 4, 1999 8:22 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesNov 4, 1999 11:54 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesNov 4, 1999 11:59 pm 
Vincent PoyNov 5, 1999 12:10 am 
Adam StrohlNov 5, 1999 5:52 am 
Adam StrohlNov 5, 1999 5:54 am 
Adam StrohlNov 5, 1999 6:35 am 
Eric J. SchwertfegerNov 5, 1999 8:44 am 
Darryl OkahataNov 5, 1999 10:09 am 
Darryl OkahataNov 5, 1999 10:21 am 
Rodney W. GrimesNov 5, 1999 10:29 am 
Rodney W. GrimesNov 5, 1999 10:46 am 
Eric J. SchwertfegerNov 5, 1999 10:47 am 
Rodney W. GrimesNov 5, 1999 11:02 am 
Darryl OkahataNov 5, 1999 11:16 am 
Oliver FrommeNov 5, 1999 11:26 am 
Jakub KlausaNov 5, 1999 2:50 pm 
Mike SmithNov 5, 1999 2:55 pm 
Mike SmithNov 5, 1999 4:30 pm 
Kevin StreetNov 5, 1999 4:30 pm 
Mike MeyerNov 5, 1999 4:42 pm 
Darryl OkahataNov 5, 1999 5:26 pm 
Tamiji HommaNov 5, 1999 5:30 pm 
Adam StrohlNov 5, 1999 5:40 pm 
Mike SmithNov 5, 1999 5:45 pm 
Tamiji HommaNov 5, 1999 6:08 pm 
Mike SmithNov 5, 1999 6:10 pm 
Kevin StreetNov 5, 1999 7:14 pm 
Vallo KallasteNov 6, 1999 2:28 am 
Tommy HallgrenNov 6, 1999 3:56 am 
sth...@nethelp.noNov 6, 1999 12:38 pm 
sth...@nethelp.noNov 7, 1999 1:08 pm 
Mike SmithNov 8, 1999 9:41 am 
Jakub KlausaNov 10, 1999 10:56 am 
Mike SmithNov 11, 1999 8:47 am 
Subject:Re: Dual Celeron + FreeBSD?
From:Darryl Okahata (darr@sr.hp.com)
Date:Nov 4, 1999 6:03:14 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-smp

"Rodney W. Grimes" <free@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote:

They do not have to be the same stepping, they must be MP comptabile steppings per the Intel Processor Errata Data Sheet. This applies to all Intel MP capible processors, from the P54 (Pentium) to the PIII Xeon.

Some combinations work, others do not.

Also they _should_ be MP tested chips, which can be determined by the S-spec number and other markings on the chip. On Pentium in is the last letter of the markings like SSS or VSS or VSU, last letter being U means only tested for UP operation, last letter being S means tested for MP operation.

Uh, the posters are talking about *Celerons*.

Celerons are not supported for SMP operation, and are probably not even tested for SMP, although many (most? all???) happen to work in an SMP configuration. It's somewhat like overclocking: if it works, great -- if it doesn't, don't expect much support (Intel won't support it, and there's precious little help here).

Also, a rumor has been ongoing (for weeks) where, supposedly, Intel is "fixing" the Celeron such that it will no longer operate in SMP mode.

These days, I'm not sure dual Celerons make sense. Unless you overclock (which I don't recommend, for all the usual reasons), you're only saving, oh, US$200-$230 compared to a comparable Pentium II-based system. Also, because of the small 128K L2 cache and the 66MHz bus (no overclocking, remember?), dual Celerons aren't as fast as dual P2s.

-- Darryl Okahata darr@sr.hp.com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or of the little green men that have been following him all day.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message