We probably need to have a meeting on this then. The spec is in public
review until the 23rd, so this could be entered as a public response and
then would have to be changed and enter another draft period. Or, we could
roll this into the next version.
Thoughts?
--Scott
On 7/16/10 3:52 PM, "Keith Fahlgren" <kei...@threepress.org> wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Hudson, Scott <scot...@pelco.com> wrote:
I thought we made a conscious decision to leave them out in favor of the
typically auto-generated method?
I suspect we probably did, but now realize that for already published
manuscripts, preserving a hardcoded db:toc can be extremely
attractive, as getting DocBook-XSL to generate exactly what you want
can be trying.
7 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-publishersRe: [docbook-publishers] Inclusion of...