atom feed161 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re...
FromSent OnAttachments
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 15, 2009 8:52 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 1:24 am 
ydeg...@free.frFeb 16, 2009 8:32 am 
Loic KessousFeb 16, 2009 9:39 am 
cyrille henryFeb 16, 2009 9:52 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 16, 2009 9:57 am 
ydeg...@free.frFeb 16, 2009 10:07 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 16, 2009 11:40 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 11:59 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 12:01 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 1:28 pm 
Matt BarberFeb 16, 2009 1:32 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 1:45 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 1:57 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 2:04 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 2:52 pm 
ydeg...@free.frFeb 16, 2009 7:48 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 8:38 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 9:03 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 16, 2009 9:04 pm 
Matt BarberFeb 16, 2009 9:36 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 10:10 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 10:24 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 16, 2009 10:29 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:20 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:25 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:28 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:28 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 16, 2009 11:36 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:36 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:44 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 17, 2009 1:06 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 1:11 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 17, 2009 1:47 am 
Loic KessousFeb 17, 2009 1:48 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 17, 2009 1:52 am 
marius schebellaFeb 17, 2009 2:24 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 4:27 am 
dmotdFeb 17, 2009 8:14 am 
Matt BarberFeb 17, 2009 8:17 am 
Matt BarberFeb 17, 2009 9:01 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:31 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:33 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:37 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:42 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 17, 2009 10:48 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 10:59 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 11:08 am 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 11:13 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:00 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:05 pm 
Steffen JuulFeb 17, 2009 12:17 pm 
Steffen JuulFeb 17, 2009 12:19 pm 
Steffen JuulFeb 17, 2009 12:25 pm 
Frank BarknechtFeb 17, 2009 12:59 pm 
Roman HaefeliFeb 17, 2009 1:02 pm 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 17, 2009 1:19 pm 
marius schebellaFeb 17, 2009 2:29 pm 
marius schebellaFeb 17, 2009 2:53 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:20 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:29 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 12:38 am 
Frank BarknechtFeb 18, 2009 1:49 am.pd, .png
Frank BarknechtFeb 18, 2009 1:52 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 2:09 am 
Luke IanniniFeb 18, 2009 2:10 am 
Martin PeachFeb 18, 2009 5:37 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 6:00 am 
Martin PeachFeb 18, 2009 6:09 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 6:21 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 18, 2009 7:02 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:00 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:01 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:35 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:39 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerFeb 18, 2009 9:59 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigFeb 18, 2009 10:28 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:30 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:42 am 
Mathieu BouchardFeb 18, 2009 10:55 am 
Andy FarnellFeb 18, 2009 10:56 am 
80 later messages
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] pow~ in Cyclone [was: Re: stripping down Pd-extended's default libs]
From:Frank Barknecht (fb@footils.org)
Date:Feb 17, 2009 12:44:13 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:

now, that pd has its own [pow~], why not just using that? yeah, it takes a bit more time to write the abstractions, but then they are more vanilla friendly.

But that's exactly why I brought this topic up and asked: What to do about pow~?

Because of the reversed inlets you cannot use the buildin pow~ when importing Max-patches without breaking the patch.

I think, the smartest thing would be to use the builtin pow~, but reverse the *connections* made to it. Because that's what I'd have to do manually now after importing a Max patch with cyclone.

An alternative would be to rename the pow~ in cyclone to something like [max_pow~] or [Pow~] and use that instead when importing.

I suppose the connection-mangling is not trivial to write and as only this one object is affected, it may be easier to just do it manually when needed. The feature, that Pd now reports overwritten classes is very useful for spotting such differences.

Ciao