atom feed27 messages in org.xml.lists.xml-devRe: [xml-dev] A question about REST a...
FromSent OnAttachments
K. Ari KrupnikovFeb 8, 2004 4:59 pm 
David MegginsonFeb 8, 2004 5:42 pm 
K. Ari KrupnikovFeb 8, 2004 8:58 pm 
Seairth JacobsFeb 9, 2004 5:45 am 
Seairth JacobsFeb 9, 2004 5:51 am 
David MegginsonFeb 9, 2004 6:21 am 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Feb 9, 2004 7:07 am 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Feb 9, 2004 7:43 am 
David MegginsonFeb 9, 2004 8:19 am 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Feb 9, 2004 8:26 am 
K. Ari KrupnikovFeb 9, 2004 11:35 am 
K. Ari KrupnikovFeb 9, 2004 1:00 pm 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Feb 9, 2004 1:45 pm 
K. Ari KrupnikovFeb 9, 2004 2:43 pm 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Feb 9, 2004 2:51 pm 
Jim AnconaFeb 9, 2004 3:04 pm 
David MegginsonFeb 9, 2004 4:46 pm 
Seairth JacobsFeb 9, 2004 6:24 pm 
K. Ari KrupnikovFeb 10, 2004 9:54 pm 
K. Ari KrupnikovFeb 10, 2004 10:13 pm 
Pete KirkhamFeb 11, 2004 2:26 am 
Julian ReschkeFeb 11, 2004 2:54 am 
Klotz, LeighFeb 11, 2004 10:18 am 
Robin BerjonFeb 11, 2004 10:21 am 
Chiusano JosephFeb 26, 2004 6:18 am 
Michael ChampionFeb 26, 2004 7:29 am 
Bullard, Claude L (Len)Feb 26, 2004 7:51 am 
Subject:Re: [xml-dev] A question about REST and transaction isolation
From:K. Ari Krupnikov (ar@cogsci.ed.ac.uk)
Date:Feb 9, 2004 1:00:55 pm
List:org.xml.lists.xml-dev

David Megginson <dmeg@attglobal.net> writes:

K. Ari Krupnikov wrote:

Client does presentation, server does business logic. Is that not in line with REST?

I'll leave it to the RESTafarians to answer that question, but sending one big chunk of information is nicely in line with the XML ideal of separating information from processing.

It doesn't solve the lost update problem.

Ari.

-- Elections only count as free and trials as fair if you can lose money betting on the outcome.