atom feed8 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoaRe: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
FromSent OnAttachments
Chiusano JosephMay 25, 2004 6:05 am 
David RR WebberMay 25, 2004 6:11 am 
Matthew MacKenzieMay 25, 2004 11:19 am 
Matthew MacKenzieMay 25, 2004 11:21 am 
David RR WebberMay 25, 2004 2:43 pm 
Duane NickullMay 26, 2004 1:13 am 
Matthew MacKenzieMay 26, 2004 5:11 am 
David RR WebberMay 26, 2004 6:43 am 
Subject:Re: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns
From:David RR Webber (dav@drrw.info)
Date:May 25, 2004 6:11:25 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.ebsoa

Joe,

I would concur and humbly submit that the best pattern language we have right now for our purposes may well be BPSS - in creating patterns of eb processes that the SOA then implements.

In the whole arena of BPM there is much work on patterns of course - and right now I'm re-visiting some old "friends" in terms of the activity diagrams and process flow description work that was done by the Prolog community that pre-dates pi-calculus - but for certain mission profiles provide an excellent fit. Horses for courses though - and with all the work on legal business process interactions that underpins the BPSS model - its hard to find a better pattern system for the eb domain IMO.

DW

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiu@bah.com> To: "ebSOA" <ebs@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 9:09 AM Subject: [ebsoa] Clarification on Patterns

I'm taking a step back and re-examining our discussions on patterns that have occurred over the past several weeks, and have some questions please:

(1) I know we've said that we've decided that we would create a pattern language - is that what we *really* want? Is it too low-level (i.e. toward assembly language) for the purposes of this TC? Patterns can be conveyed without the use of a pattern language, as IBM does in their SOA Patterns redbook.

(2) What are some examples of existing pattern languages? I did not see any glaring references in any of the e-mail threads.