28 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] 6500/7600 with Sup720 opinion
FromSent OnAttachments
Arie VaynerJan 21, 2005 3:20 pm 
Jay FordJan 21, 2005 3:47 pm 
Greg SchwimerJan 21, 2005 4:45 pm 
Jon LewisJan 21, 2005 4:59 pm 
Greg SchwimerJan 21, 2005 5:27 pm 
Mike BernicoJan 21, 2005 5:39 pm 
Colin WhittakerJan 21, 2005 8:25 pm 
Simon LeinenJan 22, 2005 5:39 pm 
Alastair PooleyJan 23, 2005 8:59 am 
Ryan O'ConnellJan 23, 2005 11:06 am 
Jon LewisJan 23, 2005 11:23 am 
Chris RobertsJan 23, 2005 12:41 pm 
Mohacsi JanosJan 24, 2005 3:37 am 
Neil J. McRaeJan 24, 2005 5:41 am 
Elmar K. BinsJan 24, 2005 6:02 am 
David J. HughesJan 25, 2005 6:13 pm 
Elmar K. BinsJan 26, 2005 4:23 am 
Mohacsi JanosJan 26, 2005 5:36 am 
Hank NussbacherJan 26, 2005 8:30 am 
Mohacsi JanosJan 26, 2005 8:37 am 
Kinczli ZoltánJan 26, 2005 8:47 am 
CEW CEWJan 26, 2005 9:06 am 
Rodney DunnJan 26, 2005 9:09 am 
Chris RobertsJan 27, 2005 4:05 pm 
Greg SchwimerJan 27, 2005 4:28 pm 
Dennis PengJan 27, 2005 6:31 pm 
David J. HughesJan 27, 2005 11:44 pm 
Chris RobertsFeb 5, 2005 7:33 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] 6500/7600 with Sup720 opinionActions...
From:Jon Lewis (jle@lewis.org)
Date:Jan 23, 2005 11:23:29 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005, Ryan O'Connell wrote:

I thought the 7600 MPLS functionality was severely limited - could only act as a core, not edge device or similar? (I forget the details)

(We're deploying 7600s next month, MPLS won't be needed immediately but we'll need it in around 6 months time - was planning to use 7200s at the edge)

AFAIK, it depends on the supervisor. AFAIK 3B and 3BXL give you full MPLS VPN P/PE functionality (more VRFs/routes per VRF on the 3BXL). Original Sup720 does not. Sup2 doesn't either.

For now, we're keeping 7200/7500 routers for MPLS.