atom feed18 messages in org.apache.cayenne.userRe: Cayenne, XML objects and JDBC 4
FromSent OnAttachments
Stephen WinnallSep 12, 2008 4:42 pm 
Andrus AdamchikSep 13, 2008 6:21 am 
Stephen WinnallSep 13, 2008 8:28 am 
Andrus AdamchikSep 15, 2008 1:03 am 
Aristedes ManiatisSep 15, 2008 1:35 am 
Stephen WinnallSep 15, 2008 5:34 am 
Tore HalsetSep 15, 2008 5:45 am 
Stephen WinnallSep 15, 2008 5:49 am 
Michael GentrySep 15, 2008 8:18 am 
Andrus AdamchikSep 15, 2008 8:22 am 
tmgs...@aol.comSep 15, 2008 1:40 pm 
Aristedes ManiatisSep 15, 2008 6:19 pm 
tmgs...@aol.comSep 15, 2008 7:02 pm 
Aristedes ManiatisSep 15, 2008 7:20 pm 
tmgs...@aol.comSep 15, 2008 7:27 pm 
Andrus AdamchikSep 15, 2008 10:09 pm 
Andrus AdamchikOct 10, 2008 8:04 am 
Stephen WinnallOct 10, 2008 9:20 am 
Subject:Re: Cayenne, XML objects and JDBC 4
From:Andrus Adamchik (and@objectstyle.org)
Date:Sep 15, 2008 1:03:43 am
List:org.apache.cayenne.user

On Sep 13, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Stephen Winnall wrote:

Do you have a feel for the effort required to support JDBC 4?

Sorry, can't give you any accurate estimate for two reasons: I still need to research the scope and after that it is hard to predict the schedule due to the volunteer nature of the project. Just adding support for a new type should not be a big deal though.

But still the same caveat remains: there is a very good chance that it won't work on Java 1.5 (even if compiled with appropriate compiler settings), as JDBC packages included in Java 1.5 do not have a bunch of JDBC 4 things (such as new type definitions).

Andrus