Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Winnall | Sep 12, 2008 4:42 pm | |
| Andrus Adamchik | Sep 13, 2008 6:21 am | |
| Stephen Winnall | Sep 13, 2008 8:28 am | |
| Andrus Adamchik | Sep 15, 2008 1:03 am | |
| Aristedes Maniatis | Sep 15, 2008 1:35 am | |
| Stephen Winnall | Sep 15, 2008 5:34 am | |
| Tore Halset | Sep 15, 2008 5:45 am | |
| Stephen Winnall | Sep 15, 2008 5:49 am | |
| Michael Gentry | Sep 15, 2008 8:18 am | |
| Andrus Adamchik | Sep 15, 2008 8:22 am | |
| tmgs...@aol.com | Sep 15, 2008 1:40 pm | |
| Aristedes Maniatis | Sep 15, 2008 6:19 pm | |
| tmgs...@aol.com | Sep 15, 2008 7:02 pm | |
| Aristedes Maniatis | Sep 15, 2008 7:20 pm | |
| tmgs...@aol.com | Sep 15, 2008 7:27 pm | |
| Andrus Adamchik | Sep 15, 2008 10:09 pm | |
| Andrus Adamchik | Oct 10, 2008 8:04 am | |
| Stephen Winnall | Oct 10, 2008 9:20 am |
| Subject: | Re: Cayenne, XML objects and JDBC 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andrus Adamchik (and...@objectstyle.org) | |
| Date: | Sep 15, 2008 1:03:43 am | |
| List: | org.apache.cayenne.user | |
On Sep 13, 2008, at 6:28 PM, Stephen Winnall wrote:
Do you have a feel for the effort required to support JDBC 4?
Sorry, can't give you any accurate estimate for two reasons: I still need to research the scope and after that it is hard to predict the schedule due to the volunteer nature of the project. Just adding support for a new type should not be a big deal though.
But still the same caveat remains: there is a very good chance that it won't work on Java 1.5 (even if compiled with appropriate compiler settings), as JDBC packages included in Java 1.5 do not have a bunch of JDBC 4 things (such as new type definitions).
Andrus





