atom feed14 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.search-ws-comment[search-ws-comment] XCQL Schema: mand...
FromSent OnAttachments
LeVan,RalphOct 25, 2010 7:01 am 
Edo PlantingaOct 25, 2010 7:12 am 
LeVan,RalphOct 25, 2010 7:27 am 
Edward C. ZimmermannOct 25, 2010 8:19 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressOct 25, 2010 3:43 pm 
LeVan,RalphOct 25, 2010 6:04 pm 
Edward C. ZimmermannOct 26, 2010 1:08 am 
Edo PlantingaOct 26, 2010 1:44 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressOct 26, 2010 6:50 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressOct 26, 2010 6:50 am 
Edward C. ZimmermannOct 26, 2010 11:54 pm 
LeVan,RalphOct 27, 2010 10:36 am 
Nicola FerroNov 3, 2010 11:48 am 
Ray Denenberg, Library of CongressDec 2, 2010 9:04 am 
Subject:[search-ws-comment] XCQL Schema: mandatory sortKeys element
From:Nicola Ferro (fer@dei.unipd.it)
Date:Nov 3, 2010 11:48:58 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.search-ws-comment

Dear All,

I would like to point to your attention a probable inconsistence between the CQL
draft specification and the XCQL XSchema.

In the XCQL Xschema of June 16, 2010 at

http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/schemas/xcql.xsd

the sortKeys element is mandatory:

<xs:complexType name="xcqlDefinition"> <xs:sequence> <xs:element ref="prefixes" minOccurs="0"/> <xs:element ref="triple"/> <xs:element ref="sortKeys"/> </xs:sequence> </xs:complexType>

On the other hand, in the draft CQL specification of September 20, 2010:

http://www.loc.gov/standards/sru/oasis/current/cql.doc

it is said that:

"A CQL query [...] may have a sort specification at the end, following the
'sortBy' keyword" (page 4)

as also reported in the ABNF query syntax:

cql-query = query [sort-spec] (page 8)

Department of Information Engineering (DEI) University of Padua Via Gradenigo, 6/A - 35131 Padova - Italy Tel +39 049 827 7939 Fax: +39 049 827 7799