Well, yes, but... Here are some consequences of having two separate
schemas identified with two separate namespaces:
Based on the above analysis, I do feel comfortable having two schemas
instead of one. If anyone DISAGREES with this, then DS-4-05 should
probably stay open, but everyone AGREES (e.g., by not
replying to this
message :-), then we could safely close it.
No, as a matter of procedure, this batch of closed issues are supposed to be
completely non-controversial. Since at least one person has a substantive
concern about this issue, I will remove it from this list, without prejudice
to the way we resolve the issue.
Just so everybody is clear, the revised list is attached.