Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Harti Brandt | Oct 13, 2003 6:42 am | |
| Bruce Evans | Oct 13, 2003 11:20 am | |
| Harti Brandt | Oct 14, 2003 1:40 am | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Oct 14, 2003 10:52 am | |
| Bruce Evans | Oct 14, 2003 12:30 pm | |
| Marcel Moolenaar | Oct 14, 2003 3:51 pm | |
| Marcel Moolenaar | Oct 15, 2003 12:46 am | |
| Kris Kennaway | Oct 15, 2003 12:53 am | |
| John-Mark Gurney | Oct 15, 2003 1:57 am | |
| Harti Brandt | Oct 15, 2003 2:02 am | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Oct 15, 2003 11:57 am | |
| Marcel Moolenaar | Oct 15, 2003 12:10 pm | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Oct 15, 2003 1:14 pm | |
| Harti Brandt | Oct 15, 2003 11:26 pm | |
| Harti Brandt | Oct 16, 2003 3:48 am | |
| Garance A Drosihn | Oct 17, 2003 12:28 pm | |
| Harti Brandt | Oct 20, 2003 1:01 am |
| Subject: | time_t on sparc64 | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Harti Brandt (bra...@fokus.fraunhofer.de) | |
| Date: | Oct 13, 2003 6:42:45 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-standards | |
Hi all,
I just discovered that time_t is 32-bit on sparc64. One of the problems is that struct timeval is defined by Posix as
struct timeval { time_t tv_secs; suseconds_t tv_usecs; };
but _timeval.h has
struct timeval { long tv_secs; suseconds_t tv_usecs; }
This means, that our timeval is not Posix compatible. What is the reason for time_t not beeing a long on sparc64?
harti
-- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private bra...@fokus.fraunhofer.de, har...@freebsd.org





