19 messages in org.apache.jackrabbit.devRe: Content Object Mapping - jcrom.org
FromSent OnAttachments
David NueschelerFeb 5, 2008 3:47 am 
Alexandru Popescu ☀Feb 5, 2008 4:11 am 
Jukka ZittingFeb 5, 2008 4:16 am 
Christophe LombartFeb 5, 2008 4:43 am 
Alex LukinFeb 5, 2008 4:47 am 
David NueschelerFeb 5, 2008 4:53 am 
IvanLatyshFeb 5, 2008 6:40 am 
Alexandru Popescu ☀Feb 5, 2008 9:20 am 
Alexandru Popescu ☀Feb 5, 2008 9:23 am 
Alex LukinFeb 5, 2008 10:25 am 
Christophe LombartFeb 5, 2008 10:53 am 
Jukka ZittingFeb 5, 2008 11:37 am 
Padraic HannonFeb 5, 2008 11:59 am 
Alex LukinFeb 5, 2008 12:05 pm 
Christophe LombartFeb 5, 2008 12:49 pm 
Alex LukinFeb 5, 2008 1:01 pm 
Alexander KlimetschekFeb 6, 2008 10:54 am 
oggMay 16, 2008 4:06 am 
Jukka ZittingMay 16, 2008 5:09 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Content Object Mapping - jcrom.orgActions...
From:Christophe Lombart (chri@gmail.com)
Date:Feb 5, 2008 12:49:51 pm
List:org.apache.jackrabbit.dev

On Feb 5, 2008 9:06 PM, Alex Lukin <luk@stu.cn.ua> wrote:

Tuesday 05 February 2008 20:53:46 Christophe Lombart написав: [skip]

Alex,

Jackrabbit OCM is also supporting the annotation like JCROM since a long time. XML support is not mandatory.

Christophe, I know because I already use it. It works somehow for me and I prefer official things even when other project looks slightly better. I speak about "hanging ends" like:

1) namespace registration, additional node types registration etc that ought to be hidden from me somewhere inside of OCM init code.

You are right and also a simpler code to init the ObjectContentManager at least for the annotation stuff. ... Still thinking about that.

2) lack of "easy quick start" example. That one on the web is just misleading and it's much better to replace it with just one line: "Dig into spources, don't bother reading docs!" Cutting example from tests is not trivial because of 1)

I know I have the first (and very small) tutorial. I plan to publish it this week but I need more time due to my daily activities :-) Jackrabbit OCM will be more adopted if we find more contributors. They are still many thinks to do and making the doc takes time. So, if you have time , you are welcome ....

Concerning JPA, we can make a small study to check if JPA is really a good solution for a JCR backend ... if someone have time :-)

Pease do it after examples and docs :)

Of course.

BTW, writing examples makes one to finally understand what a beast was created and how to eat it right way! :)

Speacking about missing features in current OCM that can be inspired by JPA ... well, finders. -- SY, Alex Lukin RIPE NIC HDL: LEXA1-RIPE