atom feed11 messages in org.apache.xmlgraphics.fop-usersRE: FW: Border issue
FromSent OnAttachments
Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)Jul 27, 2004 1:58 pm.fo, .pdf
J.PietschmannJul 28, 2004 1:20 pm 
Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)Jul 28, 2004 1:24 pm 
J.PietschmannJul 28, 2004 2:10 pm 
Amita RathoreJul 29, 2004 5:55 am 
Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)Jul 29, 2004 1:56 pm.fo, .pdf
Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)Aug 3, 2004 12:19 pm.fo, .pdf, .txt
J.PietschmannAug 3, 2004 1:38 pm 
John BurgessAug 4, 2004 2:19 am 
Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)Aug 4, 2004 11:24 am 
Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.)Aug 4, 2004 11:29 am 
Subject:RE: FW: Border issue
From:Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.) (mzal@ford.com)
Date:Aug 4, 2004 11:29:04 am
List:org.apache.xmlgraphics.fop-users

Thanks.

That's the clue I needed. When I set the cell border to 0.2mm (as opposed to 0.02mm), the background does not bleed in the last example I posted.

I will do more experiments, this time working with my original XSLT stylesheet (which outputs a roughly 160kb FO file), and see if that corrects my problem. If that fixes it, I will post the answer here so that the solution makes it into the list archive. This may be a candidate for the existing FAQs on the FOP website.

-----Original Message----- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:j332@yahoo.de] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 4:39 PM To: fop-@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: FW: Border issue

Zaleski, Matthew (M.E.) wrote:

Is there any hope of using background color (or a workaround that achieves the same effect) in 0.20.5? Your response seems to indicate that I should not be seeing this behavior.

I have no idea. A border width of 0.02mm very small though, you might run into roundoff problems (one of Acrobat Reader's most infamous weak point...)