atom feed8 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.egovRe: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots
FromSent OnAttachments
Hans A. AanesenNov 3, 2003 12:27 am 
Farrukh NajmiNov 3, 2003 4:49 am 
Hans A. AanesenNov 3, 2003 5:12 am 
Weiland, John R. NMIMC GSNov 3, 2003 5:13 am 
Farrukh NajmiNov 3, 2003 6:11 am 
Farrukh NajmiNov 3, 2003 6:32 am 
David RR WebberNov 3, 2003 10:42 am 
Farrukh NajmiNov 3, 2003 10:55 am 
Subject:Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots
From:David RR Webber (dav@drrw.info)
Date:Nov 3, 2003 10:42:41 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.egov

John,

It's ticklish! I'd like to see more user interface components built in-front of the Registry.

I agree that general users should not directly interface to the registry.

So the notion of a portal - such as the eprXML model - having access to registry content to drive enduser selections and actions - makes sense.

An XForms API for Registry might not be a bad "extra" here - so people could rapidly build forms extensions to registry that conform to the RIM. Just a thought!

DW.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Weiland, John R. NMIMC GS" <JRWe@US.MED.NAVY.MIL> To: "'Farrukh Najmi'" <Farr@Sun.COM>; "Hans A. Aanesen" <ha@iti.as> Cc: <bc@lists.oasis-open.org>; <eg@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Knut Lindelien" <Knut@nts.no> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:28 AM Subject: RE: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots

Good Morning,

This seemed to be a recurring theme during our F2F last week. I envisioned a Registry/Repository a utility for programmer's use, not a broker for end users.

r/ John Weiland

-----Original Message----- From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farr@Sun.COM] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 7:53 AM To: Hans A. Aanesen Cc: bc@lists.oasis-open.org; eg@lists.oasis-open.org; Knut Lindelien Subject: Re: [egov] BCM and eprXML pilots

Hans A. Aanesen wrote:

Hi

Thank you for a very fruitful conference.(Specially our workshop)

It is obvious that eprXML will be a very nice "face" for BCM in Governmental organized services in e-Gov SOA. Special interesting is the broader audience in the e-Gov TC and that they need a more governmental and not vendor controlled guidance.

One important topic here is the needed "single sign-on" PKI solutions based on a national repository (UDDI?)

Why do you pre-suppose UDDI here Hans?

Were you aware that UDDI *DOES NOT* provide a repository at all?

I would think that ebXML Registry would be a much better fit for a standards-based national registry/repository. It *DOES* provide a feature rich repository.

I would be glad to explore this further with the team if needed. Thanks.

-- Farrukh

built upon a _not vendor made_ specification of API Meta-models (Web Services).It is crucial that it must be built upon Governmental terms (as EPR).

Such Meta models should be approved by Governments based on recommended certificates from for instance OASIS e-Gov.

It would be nice if we could extend our eprXML pilots on a broader international basis!

We will also come back on sugestions on international pilots.

Best regards

Hans A. Aanesen

EPR-Forum Norway

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov/members/leave_workgroup.ph

p.

To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of

the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/egov/members/leave_workgroup.php.