Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 3, 2012 2:50 pm | |
| John Lindal | Jan 3, 2012 3:42 pm | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 4, 2012 12:48 am | |
| John Lindal | Jan 4, 2012 11:13 am | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 4, 2012 11:59 am | |
| John Lindal | Jan 4, 2012 12:36 pm | |
| John Lindal | Jan 6, 2012 3:08 pm | |
| Andreas Sachs | Jan 9, 2012 2:45 pm |
| Subject: | Re: strict DMI | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Andreas Sachs (andi...@gmx.de) | |
| Date: | Jan 4, 2012 11:59:42 am | |
| List: | org.apache.struts.dev | |
Hi John,
thanks for the clarification.
But to come back to my original question:
Why is <allowed-methods> not available for wildcard method invocation? Even you
expected that it is available (your first post).
Allowed-methods would be a good possibility to limit the wildcard to some method
names.
Or is there another possibility to do something like this: <action name="(Method1|Method2|Method3)Crud" class="example.Crud" method="{1}">
i expected:
<action name="*Crud" class="example.Crud" method="{1}"> <allowed-methods>Method1,Method2,Method3</allowed-methods>
Thanks for your work Andi
-- Empfehlen Sie GMX DSL Ihren Freunden und Bekannten und wir belohnen Sie mit bis zu 50,- Euro! https://freundschaftswerbung.gmx.de





