atom feed36 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-isdnRe: I4B support for US ISDN?
FromSent OnAttachments
William McVeyJan 22, 1999 5:06 pm 
Achim PatznerJan 23, 1999 5:03 am 
Martin HusemannJan 23, 1999 6:40 am 
Hellmuth MichaelisJan 23, 1999 9:04 am 
Archie CobbsJan 23, 1999 2:11 pm 
Archie CobbsJan 23, 1999 4:05 pm 
Avalon BooksJan 23, 1999 5:26 pm 
Martin HusemannJan 24, 1999 1:16 am 
Martin HusemannJan 24, 1999 1:26 am 
Hellmuth MichaelisJan 24, 1999 1:47 am 
Stefan HerrmannJan 24, 1999 4:26 am 
Hellmuth MichaelisJan 24, 1999 8:26 am 
Avalon BooksJan 24, 1999 8:44 am 
Archie CobbsJan 24, 1999 9:56 am 
Hellmuth MichaelisJan 24, 1999 10:49 am 
Achim PatznerJan 24, 1999 11:21 am 
Eivind EklundJan 24, 1999 4:36 pm 
Avalon BooksJan 24, 1999 7:45 pm 
Archie CobbsJan 24, 1999 8:06 pm 
Hellmuth MichaelisJan 25, 1999 12:54 am 
Barry ScottJan 25, 1999 2:44 am 
Achim PatznerJan 25, 1999 3:04 am 
Barry ScottJan 25, 1999 3:52 am 
Archie CobbsJan 25, 1999 11:49 am 
Avalon BooksJan 25, 1999 5:03 pm 
William McVeyJan 26, 1999 10:08 am 
H. EckertJan 26, 1999 5:41 pm 
Bert DriehuisJan 26, 1999 6:10 pm 
Avalon BooksJan 26, 1999 6:56 pm 
Archie CobbsJan 26, 1999 8:22 pm 
Andreas KlemmJan 26, 1999 9:10 pm 
Archie CobbsJan 26, 1999 10:03 pm 
Achim PatznerJan 27, 1999 3:19 am 
Ignatios SouvatzisJan 27, 1999 3:34 am 
Gary JennejohnJan 27, 1999 12:11 pm 
Thordur IvarssonJan 27, 1999 6:42 pm 
Subject:Re: I4B support for US ISDN?
From:Achim Patzner (ap@bnc.net)
Date:Jan 25, 1999 3:04:56 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-isdn

And now someone might tell me why the CCITT needs such a brain damaged vocabulary to describe the simple facts of life.

Maybe the facts are obvious to you. But would I understand them the same way? If not we cannot communicate. Much of the language of the CCITT is an attempt to be precise in specification.

Totally off-topic, but...

This is not what I wanted to say... Let me try again: The entire civilized world would use the term "byte" for data words of 8 bits size. CCITT needede to coin the term "octets" to keep the French happy. The same about the term "reference point". And calling the equipment to connect non-ISDN devices to an S reference point "Terminal Adapter" was some kind of meanness too - at that time this term was already in use for totally diffenrent equipment. It's like IBM using EBCDIC . "We're the Borg. Prepare your dictionaries to be assimilated".

I stumbled about that kind of "we don't really care" when I started working on an X.400/X.500 project a long tiome ago.

And if you care for precise specifications... Yesterday I had to learn that IETF isn't much nicer than my scrutinizing Archie's original message (which I just did to remind people of CCITT's way of demanding "precision"). And obviously their papers are definitely easier to understand ynd readable without looking up words in the glossary all the time.

Noses.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message