31 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archRe: Installing XFree86 package via sy...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Makoto Matsushita | Jun 20, 2002 9:57 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jun 21, 2002 1:44 pm | |
| Will Andrews | Jun 21, 2002 3:31 pm | |
| Makoto Matsushita | Jun 21, 2002 9:32 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 22, 2002 2:35 am | |
| Will Andrews | Jun 22, 2002 1:05 pm | |
| Alfred Perlstein | Jun 22, 2002 1:42 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 22, 2002 6:54 pm | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 22, 2002 7:12 pm | |
| M. Warner Losh | Jun 22, 2002 9:51 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 23, 2002 6:05 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 23, 2002 6:08 am | |
| Makoto Matsushita | Jun 23, 2002 8:26 am | |
| M. Warner Losh | Jun 23, 2002 8:54 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 23, 2002 9:13 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 23, 2002 12:24 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jun 23, 2002 12:37 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jun 23, 2002 12:40 pm | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 23, 2002 12:49 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 23, 2002 12:51 pm | |
| Brooks Davis | Jun 23, 2002 12:55 pm | |
| Bruce Evans | Jun 23, 2002 12:57 pm | |
| Doug Barton | Jun 23, 2002 1:07 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jun 23, 2002 1:59 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 23, 2002 2:15 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jun 23, 2002 2:20 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 23, 2002 2:49 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Jun 23, 2002 3:09 pm | |
| M. Warner Losh | Jun 23, 2002 3:41 pm | |
| Terry Lambert | Jun 23, 2002 5:15 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jun 24, 2002 2:59 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | David O'Brien (obr...@freebsd.org) | |
| Date: | Jun 23, 2002 3:09:20 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-arch | |
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 11:50:01PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
"David O'Brien" <obr...@FreeBSD.org> writes:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 11:15:46PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
"David O'Brien" <obr...@FreeBSD.org> writes:
I guess I need clarification. Since PAM modules aren't versioned, is there a problem? Or did you rename all the modules with OpenPAM?
PAM modules *are* versioned.
Uh, where??
In -CURRENT.
As I've asked you many times in the past, I cannot understand your desires from your _once_ sentance responces. This is the biggest thing that makes it almost impossible for me to work with you.
Why can't you say something like:
PAM modules used to not be versioned, however starting in -CURRENT with OpenPAM they are now versioned. Also, unlike all other shared objects, -CURRENT PAM modules do not have a non-versioned `.so' symlink (nor will they ever). Thus it is safe to put all the pam_*.so (non-versioned) into compat4x and our users' lives will be easier.
[The above is my guess of the situation from some poking around. BUT what would have been nice if you could have provided being the PAM expert of the moment.]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message