atom feed142 messages in org.apache.cocoon.devjdk 1.3: thanks (was: [RT] Is Cocoon ...
FromSent OnAttachments
25 earlier messages
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 1:41 pm 
Antonio GallardoOct 2, 2005 2:02 pm 
Pier FumagalliOct 2, 2005 3:51 pm 
Niclas HedhmanOct 2, 2005 10:11 pm 
Reinhard PoetzOct 2, 2005 10:55 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 3, 2005 2:33 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 3:10 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 3:39 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 4:09 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 4:42 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 4:50 am 
Ralph GoersOct 3, 2005 4:52 am 
Thomas LutzOct 3, 2005 5:01 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 5:06 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 5:18 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 5:26 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 5:33 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 6:20 am 
Tony CollenOct 3, 2005 6:28 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 6:35 am 
UpayaviraOct 3, 2005 6:43 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 6:44 am 
Berin LoritschOct 3, 2005 7:14 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 7:18 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 7:29 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:02 am 
Jorg HeymansOct 3, 2005 8:08 am 
Steven NoelsOct 3, 2005 8:19 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 3, 2005 8:31 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 3, 2005 8:36 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:41 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 3, 2005 8:44 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:53 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 3, 2005 8:57 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 8:59 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 9:00 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 3, 2005 9:04 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 9:11 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 3, 2005 9:20 am 
Berin LoritschOct 3, 2005 9:34 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 10:07 am 
Ross GardlerOct 3, 2005 10:17 am 
Luca MorandiniOct 3, 2005 10:30 am 
Nicola Ken BarozziOct 3, 2005 10:44 am 
Antonio GallardoOct 3, 2005 12:30 pm 
Sylvain WallezOct 3, 2005 1:38 pm 
Steven NoelsOct 4, 2005 1:08 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 4, 2005 2:16 am 
Pier FumagalliOct 4, 2005 2:31 am 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 4, 2005 2:36 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 4, 2005 3:01 am 
Andrew SavoryOct 4, 2005 3:13 am 
UpayaviraOct 4, 2005 3:17 am 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 4, 2005 3:29 am 
Steven NoelsOct 4, 2005 3:39 am 
Torsten CurdtOct 4, 2005 3:47 am 
hepaboluOct 4, 2005 4:00 am 
Joerg HeinickeOct 4, 2005 4:39 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 4, 2005 4:57 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 4, 2005 5:48 am 
Arje CahnOct 4, 2005 5:55 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 4, 2005 9:08 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 4, 2005 9:24 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 4, 2005 12:43 pm 
Steven NoelsOct 5, 2005 3:57 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 10, 2005 5:02 am 
Joerg HeinickeOct 11, 2005 2:03 pm 
Vadim GritsenkoOct 11, 2005 8:01 pm 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 11, 2005 8:16 pm 
Vadim GritsenkoOct 11, 2005 8:35 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 11, 2005 11:20 pm 
Max PfingsthornOct 12, 2005 12:31 am 
Torsten CurdtOct 12, 2005 12:32 am 
Bertrand DelacretazOct 12, 2005 12:58 am 
Sylvain WallezOct 12, 2005 1:34 am 
Carsten ZiegelerOct 12, 2005 2:21 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 12, 2005 4:52 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 12, 2005 8:58 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 12, 2005 9:01 am 
UpayaviraOct 12, 2005 9:20 am 
Vadim GritsenkoOct 12, 2005 9:38 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 12, 2005 9:47 am 
Niclas HedhmanOct 12, 2005 10:04 am 
UpayaviraOct 12, 2005 11:57 am 
hepaboluOct 12, 2005 12:43 pm 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 12, 2005 2:09 pm 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 12, 2005 2:18 pm 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 12, 2005 2:20 pm 
Sylvain WallezOct 12, 2005 2:35 pm 
Vadim GritsenkoOct 12, 2005 2:47 pm 
Daniel FagerstromOct 13, 2005 2:41 am 
Reinhard PoetzOct 13, 2005 3:25 am 
Vadim GritsenkoOct 13, 2005 8:07 am 
Ralph GoersOct 13, 2005 9:14 am 
Vadim GritsenkoOct 13, 2005 9:22 am 
Ralph GoersOct 13, 2005 9:44 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 13, 2005 9:56 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 13, 2005 10:01 am 
Stefano MazzocchiOct 13, 2005 10:05 am 
Daniel FagerstromOct 13, 2005 1:59 pm 
17 later messages
Subject:jdk 1.3: thanks (was: [RT] Is Cocoon Obsolete?)
From:Bertrand Delacretaz (bdel@apache.org)
Date:Oct 4, 2005 2:36:30 am
List:org.apache.cocoon.dev

Le 3 oct. 05, à 21:30, Antonio Gallardo a écrit :

...I WASTED not only my last weekend, but a lot of time keeping the f*** java 1.3 compatibility...

I agree about the *** but anyway, THANKS Antonio for this work.

Keeping 1.3 compatibility for the 2.1.x branch has been a community decision IIRC, and it's thanks to regular contributions like yours that this decision is a reality.

Now, of course, 1.3 is not that important today and we can certainly drop this soon - but dropping it in between minor releases wouldn't be a good idea, so big thanks!

-Bertrand