15 messages in net.java.dev.openjfx-compiler.devRe: accessibility proposal
FromSent OnAttachments
Per BothnerJun 16, 2008 4:21 pm 
Robert FieldJun 16, 2008 9:48 pm 
Joshua SmithJun 16, 2008 10:24 pm 
Rémi ForaxJun 17, 2008 12:57 am 
Ethan NicholasJun 18, 2008 6:40 am 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 7:37 am 
Shannon HickeyJun 18, 2008 7:44 am 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 8:05 am 
Robert FieldJun 18, 2008 9:32 am 
Per BothnerJun 18, 2008 12:16 pm 
Dean IversonJun 18, 2008 12:51 pm 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 12:56 pm 
Dean IversonJun 18, 2008 1:22 pm 
Brian GoetzJun 18, 2008 1:26 pm 
Christopher OliverJun 18, 2008 2:09 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: accessibility proposalActions...
From:Brian Goetz (Bria@Sun.COM)
Date:Jun 18, 2008 1:26:10 pm
List:net.java.dev.openjfx-compiler.dev

In this case, it would be desirable to distinguish between attributes in the model that are visible to the outside world and those that are only meant for the view to bind to. So I was wondering if it would be possible to somehow define the compilation unit somewhat similar to the the way you have a package statement in Java. Or perhaps more akin to Java's current module discussion. Sorry, it's only a half-baked idea and can certainly wait for later.

One of the reasons for deferring these issues is to let the Java modules work play out more completely.