atom feed20 messages in org.apache.wicket.usersRe: encapsulation, extension and tran...
FromSent OnAttachments
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 2:08 am 
Martijn DashorstMay 12, 2008 4:07 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 5:28 am 
Martijn DashorstMay 12, 2008 5:34 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 5:39 am 
Igor VaynbergMay 12, 2008 8:25 am 
Johan CompagnerMay 12, 2008 8:34 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 9:14 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 9:17 am 
Igor VaynbergMay 12, 2008 10:12 am 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 10:25 am 
Igor VaynbergMay 12, 2008 10:31 am 
Gerolf SeitzMay 12, 2008 3:00 pm 
Johan CompagnerMay 12, 2008 3:19 pm 
jWeekendMay 12, 2008 4:59 pm 
Jonathan LockeMay 12, 2008 6:24 pm 
Jonathan LockeMay 12, 2008 6:36 pm 
Eelco HilleniusMay 12, 2008 6:51 pm 
Jan KriestenMay 12, 2008 9:44 pm 
Jonathan LockeMay 12, 2008 10:52 pm 
Subject:Re: encapsulation, extension and transparent resolvers
From:Gerolf Seitz (gero@gmail.com)
Date:May 12, 2008 3:00:17 pm
List:org.apache.wicket.users

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Jan Kriesten <jan.@renitence.de> wrote:

maybe gerolf didn't want to step into ground where others may have more insight - that's the reason i filed this to jira.

correct.

also, because of what igor said:

especially if it is markup parsing code which is a pretty fragile area

in wicket.

i applied it o 1.4.x, since that's the version jan would like to see fixed. should 1.3.x and 1.4.x be in sync regarding this issue?

Gerolf