

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
11 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Re: 6500 Port Monitor| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Ziv Mosery | Jan 18, 2005 3:37 am | |
| Piltrafilla | Jan 18, 2005 4:58 am | |
| Ziv Mosery | Jan 18, 2005 5:05 am | |
| Voll, Scott | Jan 18, 2005 7:14 am | |
| Todd, Douglas M. | Jan 18, 2005 9:35 am | |
| Tim Stevenson | Jan 18, 2005 12:22 pm | |
| Tim Stevenson | Jan 18, 2005 12:30 pm | |
| Ziv Mosery | Jan 18, 2005 4:22 pm | |
| Greg Schwimer | Jan 18, 2005 7:13 pm | |
| Tim Stevenson | Jan 19, 2005 5:29 pm | |
| Justin M. Streiner | Jan 19, 2005 7:21 pm |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [c-nsp] Re: 6500 Port Monitor | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Voll, Scott (Scot...@wesd.org) | |
| Date: | Jan 18, 2005 7:14:56 am | |
| List: | net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp | |
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the limit is that both ports have to be in the same Vlan.
Scott
-----Original Message----- From: cisc...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ziv Mosery Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:06 AM To: Piltrafilla; Ziv Mosery Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] Re: 6500 Port Monitor
Thanks I found the solution but I don't know what the problem was. I had 2 destination ports both 10/100/1000 ports, one on 1000MB and one on 100MB. Was I limited because of the 100MB port? Or is there some kind of limit after all? After I did monitor only to the 1000MB port I was able to get 160MB on the monitor, my probe isn't able to get more than that so I don't know If there is a 200MB limit or not.
Thanks, Ziv
-----Original Message----- From: Piltrafilla [mailto:pilt...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 11:58 AM To: Ziv Mosery Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 6500 Port Monitor
I have done vlan monitor sessions on that way without any bandwidth limitation on SupII and Sup720. Could you paste destination interface configuration and 'sh ip interface' information?
Regards,
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:38:06 +0200, Ziv Mosery <zmosery at mercury.com> wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to do port monitoring from a VLAN to a GigE destination.
For some reason I am don't get at the destination more then 100MB.
Any reason for that?
Switch details: 6500 Sup2 MSFC2.
Configuration used:
monitor session 2 source vlan 13
monitor session 2 destination interface Gi10/45
Anyone knows of limitations that the switch might have regarding port monitor?
Thanks in advance,
Ziv
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/







